Using a Frontline Staff Intervention to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in a Large Academic Internal Medicine Clinic |
| |
| Authors: | Danielle L Heidemann Angie Adhami Anupama Nair Alexis Haftka-George Mariam Zaidan Vaidehi Seshadri Amy Tang David E Willens |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA ;2.Department of Primary Care, Dedicated Senior Medical Center, St. Petersburg, FL USA ;3.Department of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI USA |
| |
| Abstract: | BackgroundCervical cancer is the third most common malignancy affecting women. Screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) tests effectively identifies precancerous lesions and early-stage cervical cancer. While the nationwide rate of cervical cancer screening (CCS) is 84%, our urban general internal medicine (GIM) clinic population had a CCS rate of 70% in 2016.ObjectiveTo improve our clinic’s CCS rate to match or exceed the national average within 18 months by identifying barriers and testing solutions.DesignA quality improvement project led by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers.ParticipantsOur GIM clinic includes 16 attending physicians, 116 resident physicians, and 20 medical assistants (MAs) with an insured and underserved patient population.InterventionPhase 1 lasted 9 months and implemented CCS patient outreach, patient financial incentives, and clinic staff education. Phase 2 lasted 9 months and involved a workflow change in which MAs identified candidates for CCS during patient check-in. Feedback spanned the entire study period.Main MeasuresOur primary outcome was the number of Pap tests completed per month during the 2 study phases. Our secondary outcome was the clinic population’s CCS rate for all eligible clinic patients.Key ResultsAfter interventions, the average number of monthly Pap tests increased from 35 to 56 in phase 1 and to 75 in phase 2. Of 385 patients contacted in phase 1, 283 scheduled a Pap test and 115 (41%) completed it. Compared to baseline, both interventions improved cervical cancer screening (phase 1 relative risk, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.64–2.10; P < 0.001; phase 2 relative risk, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.40–3.02; P < 0.001). Our clinic’s CCS rate improved from 70% to 75% after the 18-month intervention.ConclusionsThe rate of CCS increased by 5% after a systematic 2-phase organizational intervention that empowered MAs to remind, identify, and prepare candidates during check-in for CCS.KEY WORDS: cervical cancer screening, organizational intervention, quality improvement, prevention, multidisciplinary team care |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
