首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

微侵入经皮钢板植入技术结合锁定加压钢板与普通钢板治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折的临床评价
引用本文:刘欣伟,许硕贵,张春才,苏佳灿,付青格,曹烈虎,李卓东. 微侵入经皮钢板植入技术结合锁定加压钢板与普通钢板治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折的临床评价[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2009, 12(5): 524-526
作者姓名:刘欣伟  许硕贵  张春才  苏佳灿  付青格  曹烈虎  李卓东
作者单位:第二军医大学附属长海医院骨科,上海,200433;第二军医大学附属长海医院骨科,上海,200433;第二军医大学附属长海医院骨科,上海,200433;第二军医大学附属长海医院骨科,上海,200433;第二军医大学附属长海医院骨科,上海,200433;第二军医大学附属长海医院骨科,上海,200433;第二军医大学附属长海医院骨科,上海,200433
摘    要:目的应用微侵入经皮钢板植入技术(MIPPO)植入锁定加压钢板(LCP)与常规切口普通钢板治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折,评价并比较两种方法的临床效果。方法105例胫骨远端粉碎性骨折患者随机分为MIPPO组(53例)和常规组(52例),MIPPO组置入LCP,常规组置入普通钢板,对两种术式的切口长度、出血量、手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、术后功能等指标进行比较。结果91例获11~38(23.5±9.58)个月随访。MIPPO组较常规组切口小[MIPPO组为(5.2±1.35)cm,常规组为(11.3±2.69)cm,P〈0.05],出血量少[MIPPO组为(122±45.8)ml,常规组为(260±40.3)ml,P〈0.05],手术时间短[MIPPO组(45.3±18.5)min,常规组(67.3±22.3)min,P〈0.05]。常规组1例出现骨不连并再次手术,余患者骨折均愈合良好。两组间平均住院时间、骨折愈合时间、术后功能评价比较差异均无统计学意义。结论MIPPO技术结合LCP与普通钢板均为较好治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折的方法,应用MIPPO技术结合LCP更具有优势,可减少手术损伤,间接提高治疗成功率,有利于患者肢体功能的恢复。

关 键 词:胫骨骨折  骨折固定术    外科手术  微创性  锁定加压钢板

Clinical evaluation of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with locking compressive plate and conventional plate for fixation of distal tibial comminuted fractures
LIU Xin-wei,XU Shuo-gui,ZHANG Chun-cai,SU Jia-can,FU Qing-ge,CAO Lie-hu,LI Zhuo-dong. Clinical evaluation of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with locking compressive plate and conventional plate for fixation of distal tibial comminuted fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics, 2009, 12(5): 524-526
Authors:LIU Xin-wei  XU Shuo-gui  ZHANG Chun-cai  SU Jia-can  FU Qing-ge  CAO Lie-hu  LI Zhuo-dong
Affiliation:Dept of Orthopaedics;the Affiliated Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University;Shanghai 200433;China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO) with locking compressive plate(LCP) and conventional plate for fixation of distal tibial comminuted fractures.Methods MIPPO technique was applied in 53 out of 105 cases,classic technique for fixation was applied in the other cases.Length of the incision,blood loss,operating time,hospital stay,fracture healing time and postoperative function were compared.Results 91 patients were followed up for 11~38 months(mean 23.5±9.58 months),one cases sustained bone nonunion and got revision and the others had successful got bone union with mean time 3.1 months of MIPPO group and 3.4 months of classic incision group.The length of incision was(5.2±1.35)cm in MIPPO group and(11.3±2.69)cm in conventional group;blood loss was(122±45.8)ml in MIPPO group and(260±40.3)ml in conventional group;operation time was(45.3±18.5)min in MIPPO group and(67.3±22.3)min in conventional group.The differences were significant(P〈0.05).Mean original hospistal stay,bone union time and fuctional results were not significant different.Conclusions Application of minimally invasive percutuneous plate osteosynthesis with LCP as a superior option compared with conventional plate will be a better choice for fixation of distal tibial comminuted fractures.
Keywords:tibial fractures  fracture fixation  internal  surgical procedure  minimally invasive  locking compressive plate  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号