首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

肝细胞性肝癌组织中LVD和MVD的表达及其与肝癌侵袭转移的关系
引用本文:廖文胜,李江发,何阳阳,李西融,唐澄海,杜延召. 肝细胞性肝癌组织中LVD和MVD的表达及其与肝癌侵袭转移的关系[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2018, 30(1): 10-13. DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2018.01.003
作者姓名:廖文胜  李江发  何阳阳  李西融  唐澄海  杜延召
作者单位:1.广西壮族自治区南溪山医院 肝胆胰外科,广西 桂林 5410002.桂林医学院附属医院 肝胆胰外科,广西 桂林 541000
基金项目:广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科攻1290003-2-3);广西壮族自治区卫计委自筹经费课题(Z2015378);广西高校中青年教师基础能力提升项目(K Y 2016Y B326)。
摘    要:[摘要] 目的 研究肝细胞性肝癌组织中淋巴管密度(lymphatic vessel density,LVD)和微血管密度(microvessel density,MVD)在肝细胞性肝癌中的表达,及其与肝癌侵袭和转移的关系。方法 采用免疫组织化学Supervision法分别检测40例肝细胞性肝癌患者的癌组织、癌旁组织以及10例非肝癌患者的肝脏组织中LVD和MVD的表达情况,分析其与肝癌肝内转移、门脉癌栓和淋巴转移间的关系;分析癌旁组织LVD与癌组织MVD表达之间的关系。结果?在40例肝细胞性肝癌患者的癌组织、癌旁组织及10例非肝癌患者的肝脏组织中平均LVD值分别为(10.65±3.75)、 (8.98±2.52)、 (3.15±1.49);癌组织与癌旁组织及正常组织的LVD值差异有均统计学意义(均 P <0.01)。癌组织、癌旁组织及正常肝脏组织平均MVD值分别为(71.08±43.19)、 (23.20±4.70)、 (16.80±3.01),癌组织与癌旁组织及正常组织的MVD值差异有统计学意义(均 P <0.01)。结论 肝细胞性肝癌组织中LVD及MVD高表达,与肝内转移、门静脉癌栓及淋巴转移有关。

关 键 词:肝细胞性肝癌   淋巴管密度   微血管密度   淋巴结转移  

Study on the association of LVd and MVd expression levels in hepatocelluar carcinoma tissue with the invasiveness and metastasis of hepatocelluar carcinoma
LIAO Wen-sheng,LI Jiang-fa,HE Yang-yang,LI Xi-rong,TANG Deng-hai,DU Yan-zhao. Study on the association of LVd and MVd expression levels in hepatocelluar carcinoma tissue with the invasiveness and metastasis of hepatocelluar carcinoma[J]. Journal of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, 2018, 30(1): 10-13. DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2018.01.003
Authors:LIAO Wen-sheng  LI Jiang-fa  HE Yang-yang  LI Xi-rong  TANG Deng-hai  DU Yan-zhao
Affiliation:1 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Nanxishan Hospital, Guilin, Guangxi 541000, China;
2 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi 541000, China
Abstract:Abstract objective To reveal the the expression of lymphatic vessel density (LVD) and microvessel density (MVD) in hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) tissue, and the relationship with the invasiveness and metastasis of HCC. Methods Supervision was used as an immunohistochemical technique, and the expressions of LVD and MVD were measured respectively in paracancerous and carcinoma tissues of 40 HCC patients and 10 non-HCC patients. By doing so, the relationship between the expressions and intrahepatic metastasis, portal vein thrombus, and lymphatic metastasis was analyzed. Moreover, the correlation between LVD in the paracancerous tissue and MVD in the carcinoma tissue was explored. Results It was found that the mean LDVs in the carcinoma tissues and the paracancerous tissues of the 40 HCC patients, and in the liver tissues of the 10 non-HCC patients were (10.65±3.75), (8.98±2.52), and (3.15±1.49), respectively, indicating there was a significant difference (P<0.01) between the carcinoma tissues and the paracancerous or normal liver tissues. Furthermore, the mean MVDs in the carcinoma tissues and the paracancerous tissues of the 40 HCC patients, and in the liver tissues of the 10 non-HCC patients, were (71.08±43.19), (23.20±4.70) and (16.80±3.01), respectively. A significant difference (P<0.01) was also found between the carcinoma tissues and the paracancerous tissues or normal liver tissues. Conclusion The over-expression of LVD and MVD in HCC tissues is found in this study, which may be associated with intrahepatic metastasis, portal vein thrombus, and lymphatic metastasis in liver tissues.
Keywords:hepatocelluar carcinoma   lymphatic vessel density   microvessel density   lymphatic metastasis  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《肝胆胰外科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《肝胆胰外科杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号