首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Assessing the health care needs of women in rural British Columbia: Development and validation of a survey tool
Authors:Meghan Guy  Wendy V Norman  Unjali Malhotra
Institution:Dr Guy is a family physician currently practising in rural British Columbia as a locum tenens physician. Dr Norman is Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Practice at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. Dr Malhotra is Medical Director of Options for Sexual Health—British Columbia, is affiliated with BC Women''s Hospital and Health Centre, and is Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of British Columbia
Abstract:

Objective

To design reliable survey instruments to evaluate needs and expectations for provision of women''s health services in rural communities in British Columbia (BC). These tools will aim to plan programming for, and evaluate effectiveness of, a women''s health enhanced skills residency program at the University of British Columbia.

Design

A qualitative design that included administration of written surveys and on-site interviews in several rural communities.

Setting

Three communities participated in initial questionnaire and interview administration. A fourth community participated in the second interview iteration. Participating communities did not have obstetrician-gynecologists but did have hospitals capable of supporting outpatient specialized women''s health procedural care.

Participants

Community physicians, leaders of community groups serving women, and allied health providers, in Vancouver Island, Southeast Interior BC, and Northern BC.

Methods

Two preliminary questionnaires were developed to assess local specialized women''s health services based on the curriculum of the enhanced skills training program; one was designed for physicians and the other for women''s community group leaders and aboriginal health and community group leaders. Interview questions were designed to ensure the survey could be understood and to identify important areas of women''s health not included on the initial questionnaires. Results were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods, and a second draft of the questionnaires was developed for a second iteration of interviews.

Main findings

Clarity and comprehension of questionnaires were good; however, nonphysician participants answered that they were unsure on many questions pertaining to specific services. Topics identified as important and missing from questionnaires included violence and mental health. A second version of the questionnaires was shown to have addressed these concerns.

Conclusion

Through iterations of pilot testing, we created 2 validated survey instruments for implementation as a component of program evaluation. Testing in remote locations highlighted unique rural concerns, such that University of British Columbia health care professional training will now better serve BC community needs.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号