| 急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死患者86例急诊诊疗状况回顾性分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵立众. 急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死患者86例急诊诊疗状况回顾性分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2011, 8(21): 41-43 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵立众 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京航天总医院急诊科,北京,100076 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：观察急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊患者不同诊疗方式的疗效,评价不同诊疗方式的临床应用价值。方法：回顾性分析我院急诊科于2007年1月～2010年3月收治抢救的急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死患者86例的临床资料,分析不同治疗方式的疗效及对预后的影响。结果：经皮冠状动脉腔内介入治疗（PCI）药物应用与普通药物治疗差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,临床疗效优于普通药物治疗,其心血管不良事件的发生率及死亡率也较普通药物治疗更低（P〈0.05）。结论：普通药物联合经皮冠状动脉腔内介入治疗是治疗急性非ST段心肌梗死的有效手段,可明显改善近期预后。
|
| 关 键 词： | 心肌梗死 非ST段抬高 介入干预 |
Retrospective analysis of the emergency treatment about 86 cases of acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
| |
| ZHAO Lizhong. Retrospective analysis of the emergency treatment about 86 cases of acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. China Medical Herald, 2011, 8(21): 41-43 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Lizhong |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHAO Lizhong Department of Emergency,Beijing Aerospace General Hospital,Beijing 100076,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective: To observe and valuate the efficacy of different treatments of acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Methods: 86 cases acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were retrospectively analyzed in emergency department of our hospital from January 2007 to March 2010.Then meta-analysis the efficacy of different treatment modalities and prognosis.Results: There had no significant difference between percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention(PCI) and general medic... |
| |
| Keywords: | Acute myocardial infarction Non-ST-segment elevation Intervention |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
