Comparison of wire-guided percutaneous insertion and conventional surgical insertion of intra-aortic balloon pumps in 151 patients

Over a 25-month period, percutaneous wire-guided balloon catheter insertion was attempted in 51 patients, and intra-aortic balloon pump insertion was attempted by conventional surgical method in 100 patients. The success rate in the group undergoing percutaneous insertion was 90.2 percent (46 of 51) and 90 percent in the group undergoing surgical insertion (90 of 100). The indications for intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation were diverse in both groups. The major complication rate in the patient population undergoing percutaneous intra-aortic balloon pump insertion was 15.2 versus 15.6 percent for the surgical group, and there were no cases of leg amputation or aortic dissection in the percutaneous group; however, two cases of leg amputation and one case of aortic dissection resulting in death occurred in the surgical group. The percutaneous intra-aortic balloon pump insertion technique was successfully employed in conjunction with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in six cases. It is concluded that the wire-guided percutaneous balloon catheter method is a highly successful and rapid means of instituting intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in a wide variety of clinical situations. However, because of the significant associated complication rate, the decision to institute balloon counterpulsation must weigh the benefit-to-risk ratio, and this procedure must still be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.