首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同新辅助化疗方案治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的疗效比较
引用本文:曹茵,张爱玲,马利亚,王永霞,陈彩芹,吴清时. 不同新辅助化疗方案治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的疗效比较[J]. 实用预防医学, 2006, 13(1): 68-69
作者姓名:曹茵  张爱玲  马利亚  王永霞  陈彩芹  吴清时
作者单位:东莞市人民医院,广东,东莞,523018
摘    要:目的探讨新辅助化疗不同的治疗方案对局部晚期乳腺癌的患者的疗效。方法72例接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌(ⅢA期)患者随机分为3组:即TA组(n=24)(紫杉醇联合吡柔比星):TXL 135 mg/m2静滴,d1,THP 40 mg/m2静推,d2。CAF组(n=24)(吡柔比星联合环磷酰胺,5-氟尿嘧啶):THP 40 mg/m2静推,d1,CTX 600 mg/m2,静推,d1.8,5-FU 12 mg/kg,d1-5,静滴。CMF组(n=24)(环磷酰胺联合5-氟尿嘧啶,氨甲喋呤):CTX 600 mg/m2静推d1.8,5-FU 12 mg/kg,静滴,d1-5,MTX 0.4 mg/kg,d1,静推。21 d为一个周期,2个周期后对乳腺癌原发病灶及腋窝淋巴结状态进行观察及分析。结果TA组总有效率为83%,CAF组总有效率为63%,CMF组总有效率25%。TA组与CMF组相比较有显著差异(P<0.05),CAF组与CMF组相比较有显著差异(P<0.05),TA组与CAF组相比较无统计学意义(t=0.022,P>0.05)。结论TA组和CAF组在局部晚期的乳腺癌新辅助治疗的过程中疗效满意,毒副反应可以耐受,值得推广。

关 键 词:局部乳腺癌  新辅助化疗  紫杉醇  吡柔比星
文章编号:1006-3110(2006)01-0068-02
收稿时间:2005-12-08
修稿时间:2005-12-08

Observation on Therapeutic Effect of Different Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
CAO Yin, ZHANG An - ling, MALi - ya, et ai.. Observation on Therapeutic Effect of Different Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer[J]. Practical Preventive Medicine, 2006, 13(1): 68-69
Authors:CAO Yin   ZHANG An - ling   MALi - ya   et ai.
Abstract:Objective Approach on the therapeutic effect of different neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. Methods Seventy-two patients with advanced breast cancer received different newly developed adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned into three groups: Group TA(n=24,paclitaxel and pirarubicin),Taxol 135 mg/m~2 iv drip,d1,THP 40 mg/m~2 iv,d2;Group CAF(n=24,pirarubicin,cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil),THP 40 mg/m~2 iv,d1,CTX 600 mg/m~2 iv,d1.8,5-FU 12 mg/kg,d1-5,iv drip;and Group CMF(n=24,cyclophosphamide,5-fluorouracil and methotrexate),CTX 600 mg/m~2 iv d1.8,5-FU 12 mg/kg,iv drip,d1-5,MTX 0.4 mg/kg,d1,iv.Each therapeutic course was completed within 21 days.The primary breast cancer and axillary lymphadenopathy were observed at the end after 2 therapeutic courses completed. Result The effective rate of TA was 83%,CAF was(63%),and CMF was 25%.There were significant differences between the TA and CMF groups(P<0.05)and also between the CAF and CMF groups(P<0.05),but not between the TA and CAF groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Group TA and group CAF have satisfactory effect.
Keywords:Locally advanced breast cancer  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy  Paclitaxel  Pirarubicin  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号