Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field |
| |
Authors: | Kirsten Sucker Ralf Both Michael Bischoff Rainer Guski Gerhard Winneke |
| |
Institution: | iku GmbH, Olpe 39, 44135 Dortmund, Germany. sucker@iku-gmbh.de |
| |
Abstract: | Objective Odors can be evaluated as being pleasant or unpleasant (hedonic tone), but this differentiation was not incorporated into
environmental odor regulation. In order to study the hedonic-induced modification of dose–response associations for community
odor annoyance a pertinent field study was conducted. This paper covers the first step, namely the development and validation
of a standardized human observation strategy for the direct quantification of the frequency, intensity, and hedonic tone of
environmental odors in the field.
Methods Grids with equidistant observation points were located around six industrial odor sources, two with pleasant (sweets, rusk
bakery), two with neutral (textile production, seed oil production), and two with unpleasant odor emissions (fat refinery,
cast iron production). These points were visited by trained observers, screened for normal olfaction and reliable performance,
in a systematic fashion for an observation time of 10 min duration. Exposure-related information from the observers in terms
of frequency, intensity (six-point scale) and hedonic tone (nine-point scale) were compared to that of 1,456 residents using
the same rating scales.
Results Residents evaluated the industrial odors more intense and more unpleasant than the panelists. Furthermore, for the residents
only negative relations between odor intensity and hedonic tone were found while for the observer pleasant odor became more
pleasant with increasing intensity. Instead of three classes of industrial odors, namely pleasant, neutral and unpleasant,
the responses allowed only for two odor classes, namely pleasant and not pleasant, the latter also covering the neutral category.
Conclusions The developed methodology has been shown to yield valid information about odor exposure in the field. With regard to different
application settings the discrepancies between external observers and affected residents are discussed in terms of different
information processing strategies, namely stimulus-based (bottom-up) for the panel and memory-based and, thus, subject to
cognitive bias for the residents (top-down).
Parts of these findings were presented at the 15th Congress of the European Chemoreception Research Organization in Erlangen
(2002), at the 43rd Congress of the German Society of Psychology in Berlin (2002), and at the at the 9th Meeting of the International
Neurotoxicology Association in Dresden (2003). |
| |
Keywords: | Odor perception Frequency Intensity Hedonic tone Field study |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|