即刻种植在前牙区美学修复中的临床效果

探究前牙区种植美学修复中即刻种植与延迟种植的应用效果。方法 选取2018年1月-2022年 1月黄骅市骨科医院接诊的100例前牙区种植患者为研究对象，按照修复方案的不同分成即刻组和延迟组， 每组50例。即刻组开展即刻修复治疗，延迟组开展延迟修复治疗，比较两组种植成功率、美学评分、 种植体边缘骨吸收量。结果 即刻组种植成功率为98.00%，与延迟组的96.00%比较，差异无统计学意义 （P ＞0.05）；两组治疗后3个月PES、WES评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05），即刻组治疗后6个月 PES、WES评分均高于延迟组，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）；即刻组治疗后6个月种植体边缘骨吸收量 低于延迟组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 前牙区种植采用即刻种植效果更佳，美学效果更好。

Clinical Effect of Immediate Implantation in Aesthetic Restoration of Anterior Teeth Area

To explore the application effect of immediate implantation and delayed implantation in aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Methods From January 2018 to January 2022, 100 patients with implant in anterior teeth area admitted to Huanghua Orthopedic Hospital were selected as the research objects. According to the different repair schemes, they were divided into immediate group and delayed group, with 50 patients in each group. The immediate group was treated with immediate implantation, and the delayed group was treated with delayed implantation. The implant success rate, aesthetic score and marginal bone resorption of the implant were compared between the two groups. Results The success rate of implantation in the immediate group was 98.00%, compared with 96.00% in the delayed group, the difference was not statistically significant (P >0.05). There was no significant difference in PES and WES scores between the two groups at 3 months after treatment (P >0.05). The PES and WES scores of the immediate group were higher than those of the delayed group at 6 months after treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). The marginal bone resorption of the immediate group was lower than that of the delayed group at 6 months after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Immediate implantation in anterior teeth area has better effect and better aesthetic effect.