Private health expenditure in the Greek health care system: Where truth ends and the myth begins |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Center for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Nursing, University of Athens, 123 Papadiamantopoulou Street, 11527 Athens, Greece;2. Open University of Cyprus, Greece;1. Section of Pediatric Epilepsy, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children''s Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA;2. Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics and Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children''s Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA;3. Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA;4. Department of Pathology, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA;5. Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA;6. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA;1. Center for Health Policy and Public Health, College of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babe?-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;2. Department of Public Health and Management, Iuliu Ha?ieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;3. Department of International Health, Health Systems Program, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA;4. World Health Organization Country Office, Bucharest, Romania;1. Department of Public Health, Babe?-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, 400376, Romania;2. Oxford Policy Management Ltd, Oxford, UK;3. Romanian Health Observatory, Bucharest, Romania;1. Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands;2. African Institute for Development Policy, Malawi |
| |
| Abstract: | Greece today has the most “privatized” health care system among EU countries. Given the country's universal coverage by a public system this may be called “the Greek paradox”. The Objective of this paper is to analyze private health payments by provider and type of service in order to bring to light the reasons for and the nature of the extraordinary private expenditure in Greece. Methods: We used a randomized countrywide sample of 1616 households. Regression analysis was used to determine the extent to which social and economic household characteristics influence the frequency of use of certain health services and the size of household payments for such services. In all statistical analyses we used the p < 0.05 level of significance. Results: Out of the total private household health expenditure (€6141 million), 66% is for outpatient services, with the largest share for dental services, absorbing 31.1% (€1912 million or 1.5% of GDP) of the total out-of-pocket health expenditure. Rural dwellers seek private outpatient care more often, because of the understaffed public primary facilities. The hospital sector absorbs less than 15% (or €884 million) of household private health expenditure. A significant part (20%) of hospital care financed privately concerns informal payments within public hospitals, an amount almost equal with formal payments in the form of cost sharing. Admissions to private hospitals are only 16% of total admissions. Our results indicate that this is a result of the political emphasis in public hospitals and of the considerably high cost of private hospital care. Conclusions: The rise in private health expenditure and the development of the private sector during the last 20 years in Greece is associated with public under financing. The gap was filled by the private sector through increased investment, mostly in upgraded amenities and new technology. Today, the complementary nature of private care in Greece is no longer disputed, but is a matter of serious concern, as it undermines the constitutionally guaranteed free access and equitable distribution of health resources. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
