首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腔内激光、射频及内翻剥脱联合旋切术治疗下肢静脉曲张近期疗效的比较
引用本文:刘鹏,叶志东,樊雪强,王非,林凡,曹德生,杨煜光,王凤林. 腔内激光、射频及内翻剥脱联合旋切术治疗下肢静脉曲张近期疗效的比较[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2008, 23(3)
作者姓名:刘鹏  叶志东  樊雪强  王非  林凡  曹德生  杨煜光  王凤林
作者单位:中日友好医院心脏血管外科,北京,100029
摘    要:目的 比较腔内激光、射频及内翻剥脱联合旋切术治疗下肢静脉曲张的近期疗效.方法 回顾性分析2004年6月至2007年1月收治的有明确大隐静脉反流的下肢静脉曲张的460例患者的临床资料,其中200例(232条肢体)采用腔内激光(endovenous laser treatment,EVLT)治疗;80例(88条肢体)采用腔内射频(radiofrequency endovenous occlusion,RFO)治疗;180例(202条肢体)采用内翻剥脱术治疗.曲张静脉均采用透光旋切术(transilluminated powered phlebectomy,TIPP)治疗.比较3种方法手术时间、手术切口、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症及术后1年时的复发率.结果 手术时问RFO组最长,平均(41±8)min,EVLT组与内翻剥脱组相近.术后住院时间EVLT组(1.2±0.4)d与RFO组(2.1±0.8)d较短,与内翻剥脱组比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术中出血量内翻剥脱组较其他两组多;EVLT组与RFO组的手术切口少;术后1年三组复发率相当,隐神经损伤在内翻剥脱组较多.静脉临床严重程度评分(the venous clinical severity score,VCSS)各组术后较术前明显减少,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 三组手术效果均满意且疗效相当,但激光、射频具有创伤小,并发症少的优点.

关 键 词:静脉曲张  激光  射频  剥脱治疗

Endovenous laser treatment,radiofrequency endovenous occlusion and conventional stripping combined with transilluminated powered phlebectomy for lower extremity varicose vein
LIU Peng,YE Zhi-dong,FAN Xue-qiang,WANG Fei,LIN Fan,CAO De-sheng,YANG Yu-guang,WANG Feng-lin. Endovenous laser treatment,radiofrequency endovenous occlusion and conventional stripping combined with transilluminated powered phlebectomy for lower extremity varicose vein[J]. Chinese Journal of General Surgery, 2008, 23(3)
Authors:LIU Peng  YE Zhi-dong  FAN Xue-qiang  WANG Fei  LIN Fan  CAO De-sheng  YANG Yu-guang  WANG Feng-lin
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results of endovenous laser treatment(EVLT),radiofrequency endovenous occlusion(RFO)and conventional stripping combined with transilluminated powered phlebectomy(TIPP)for lower extremity varicose vein.Methods From Jun 2004 to Jan 2007,200 cases(232 limbs)were treated by EVLT with TIPP,80 cases(88 limbs)by RFO with TIPP,and 180 cases(202 limbs)by conventional stripping with TIPP.Operation time,number of the incision made,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative hospital stay,complications,and one-year recurrence rate were compared with each other. Results Operation time was longer(41±8)min in RFO group than that in other two groups.Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in EVLT group(1.2±0.4 d)and RFO group (2.1±0.8 d)than that in stripping and TIPP group(P<0.05).Patients in stripping group also suffered from more intra-operative bleeding more often incidental nervus saphenus injury and more incision numbers when compared with other two groups(P<0.05).There was no significant difierence in one-year recurrence rate among patients in the three groups. Conclusions The clinical efficacy is almost the same among the three groups in terms of eradication of the varicose veins.EVLT and RFO are safe and minimal invasive for the treatment of lower extremity varicose vein.
Keywords:Varicose veins  Lasers  Radiofrequency  Stripping
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号