首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

药物支架和裸支架治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者的随访研究
引用本文:王崇慧,刘立志,沈珠军,方全,张抒扬,范中杰,金晓峰,谢洪智,刘震宇.药物支架和裸支架治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者的随访研究[J].中华老年医学杂志,2010,29(1):461-463.
作者姓名:王崇慧  刘立志  沈珠军  方全  张抒扬  范中杰  金晓峰  谢洪智  刘震宇
作者单位:北京协和医院心内科,中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,100730;浙江省奉化市人民医院心内科;
摘    要:Objective To evaluate the effects of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ASTEMI) receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods The 217patients with ASTEMI receiving PPCI from Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2007 were enrolled in this study. And they were divided into two groups: DES group (n=92) and BMS group (n=125). The baseline characteristics including age, gender, angiographic characteristics, stents characteristics, Killip classification, cardiac troponin I(CTnI)levels, left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF), hemoglobin levels, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity and smoking of the two groups were collected.Clinical follow-up end point were major adverse cardiac event(MACE)including death, acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stent restenosis. Clinical follow-up duration was(16.8±11.3) months (6-38 months). Results The average age (years), rate of Killip classification (class 2, 3, 4), average diameter (mm) of stent were significantly higher in BMS group than in DES group(64.6±11.9 vs. 61.2±11.8, t=2.09, P=0.037;25.9% vs. 12.2%, χ2=5.53, P=0.019;3.07±0.38 vs. 2.91±0. 40, t=2.78, P=0.006). And the average LVEF (%) was significantly lower in BMS group than in DES group (55.4±11.9 vs. 60.3±12.8, t= -2.57, P=0.011). The average length (mm) of stent, rate of stent post dilatation and diabetes were significantly higher in DES group than inBMSgroup (32.8±16.2 vs. 26.2±11.2, t=-3.54, P=0.001;45.7% vs. 21.6%, χ2=13.85, P=0. 000;28.2% vs. 16.0%, χ2=4.77, P=0.030). MACE occurred in 36 patients during clinical follow-up, 6 in DES group and 30 in BMS group. Incidence of MACE was significantly lower in DES group than in BMS group(6.5% vs. 24.0%, χ2=11.70, P<0.01). Conclusions Using DES in ASTEMI patients is safe and may improve clinical outcomes by reducing incidence of MACE compared with BMS.

关 键 词:心肌梗死    血管成形术  经腔  经皮冠状动脉    支架    预后    

Clinical follow-up outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
WANG Chong-hui,LIU Li-zhi,SHEN Zhu-jun,FANG Quan,ZHANG Shu-yang,FAN Zhong-jie,JIN Xiao-feng,XIE Hong-zhi,LIU Zhen-yu.Clinical follow-up outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J].Chinese Journal of Geriatrics,2010,29(1):461-463.
Authors:WANG Chong-hui  LIU Li-zhi  SHEN Zhu-jun  FANG Quan  ZHANG Shu-yang  FAN Zhong-jie  JIN Xiao-feng  XIE Hong-zhi  LIU Zhen-yu
Abstract:
Keywords:Myocardial infarctionAngioplasty  transluminal  percutaneous coronaryStentsPrognosis
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号