首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Selecting donors of platelets for refractory patients on the basis of HLA antibody specificity
Authors:Petz L D  Garratty G  Calhoun L  Clark B D  Terasaki P I  Gresens C  Gornbein J A  Landaw E M  Smith R  Cecka J M
Institution:Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and of Biomathematics and the Immunogenetics Center, UCLA Medical Center.
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Patients who are refractory to platelet transfusion as a result of HLA alloimmunization are generally given HLA-matched or crossmatched platelets. However, HLA-matched platelets that are matched at HLA-A and -B loci (A-matched) or those without any mismatched or cross-reactive antigens (BU-matched) are frequently unavailable. A disadvantage of crossmatching is that crossmatched platelets have a shelf life of only 5 days, so that crossmatch tests must be performed frequently for patients requiring long-term platelet transfusions. An alternative method is the selection of platelets according to the patient's HLA antibody specificity, called the antibody specificity prediction (ASP) method. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anti-human globulin-enhanced microlymphocytotoxicity test modified by a double addition of serum and a computer program were used to determine the specificity of patients' HLA antibodies. Platelet crossmatching was performed with a solid-phase adherence assay. The percentage of platelet recovery (PPR) was determined in 1621 platelet transfusions in an observational study in 114 patients, and the PPR of platelets selected by the ASP method was compared with the PPR of those that were HLA-matched, crossmatched, or randomly selected. The numbers of potential donors in files of HLA-typed donors as identified by HLA matching vs. the ASP method were determined. RESULTS: After adjustments for covariates, the mean +/- SEM PPR was similar for HLA-matched (21 +/-4%), cross-matched (23+/-4%), and ASP-selected (24+/-3%) platelets and was significantly lower for randomly selected (15+/-1.4%) platelets. For 29 alloimmunized HLA-typed patients, the mean number of potential donors found in a file of 7247 HLA-typed donors was 6 who were an HLA-A match (median = 1), 33 who were an HLA-BU match (median = 20), and 1426 who were identified by the ASP method (median = 1365). CONCLUSION: The ASP method of donor selection for refractory alloimmunized patients appears as effective as HLA matching or crossmatching. Far more donors are identified in a file of HLA-typed donors by the ASP method than by HLA matching, and this indicates that the ASP method provides important advantages regarding the availability of compatible platelet components.
Keywords:AHG = anti-human globulin  A-matched = matched at HLA-A and -B loci antigens  ARCBS = American Red Cross Blood Services  ASP = antibody specificity prediction  BU-matched = without any mismatched or crossreactive antigens  BX = with crossreactive antigens  C-matched = with one mismatched antigen  DIC = disseminated intravascular coagulation  D-matched = with more than one mismatched antigen  HPA(s) = human platelet antigens(s)  LCT = lymphocytotoxicity  MLCT = microlymphocytotoxicity  PPR = percentage of platelet recovery  PRA = panel-reactive antibodies
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号