首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

ARFI、Forns指数、FIB-4和APRI无创诊断慢性乙型病毒性肝炎肝纤维化的研究
引用本文:刘京,刘映霞,董常峰,姚思敏,李莎茜,袁静,陈川铁,赵美芬,林益敏,彭忠田.ARFI、Forns指数、FIB-4和APRI无创诊断慢性乙型病毒性肝炎肝纤维化的研究[J].中国肝脏病杂志(电子版),2014(1):18-21.
作者姓名:刘京  刘映霞  董常峰  姚思敏  李莎茜  袁静  陈川铁  赵美芬  林益敏  彭忠田
作者单位:[1]深圳巿第三人民医院感染科,感染性疾病国家重点学科,广东深圳518112 [2]南华大学第一临床学院感染科,湖南衡阳421001
基金项目:深圳市医学重点专科基金(201161),深圳市科技创新委技术开发项目基金(CXZZ20130322170220544)
摘    要:目的声辐射力脉冲成像技术(ARFI)及血清学诊断模型(Forns指数、FIB-4、APRI)对慢性乙型病毒性肝炎肝纤维化评估的价值。方法 111例确诊为慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者,根据肝组织活检病理分期结果分组:无明显肝纤维化组(S0、S1)40例,明显肝纤维化组(≥S2)48例、早期肝硬化组(S4)23例。每例患者同期进行ARFI、Forns指数、FIB-4、APRI的评估。比较无创诊断模型与肝脏病理的相关性,并根据受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析无创诊断模型对肝纤维化的诊断价值。结果ARFI、Forns指数、FIB-4、APRI 4种无创诊断方法与肝组织活检具有良好的一致性,其皮尔逊相关系数(Pearson correlation coefficient)分别为0.882、0.639、0.589、0.418。明显肝纤维化组(≥S2)及早期肝硬化组,ARFI的诊断价值均优于FIB-4(Z=2.882,P=0.004;Z=3.215,P=0.001)、APRI(Z=4.850,P0.001;Z=3.198,P=0.001)、Forns指数(Z=2.182,P=0.029;Z=2.798,P=0.005)。结论 ARFI对明显肝纤维化及早期肝硬化的诊断具有较高的价值,值得推广。

关 键 词:无创诊断  慢性乙型病毒性肝炎  肝纤维化

ARFI,Forns index,FIB-4 and APRI diagnosis liver ifbrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases
LIU Jing,LIU Ying-xia,DONG Chang-feng,YAO Si-min,LI Sha-xi,YUAN Jing,CHEN Chuan-tie,ZHAO Mei-fen,LIN Yi-min,PENG Zhong-tian.ARFI,Forns index,FIB-4 and APRI diagnosis liver ifbrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases[J].Chinese Journal of Liver Diseases(Electronic Version),2014(1):18-21.
Authors:LIU Jing  LIU Ying-xia  DONG Chang-feng  YAO Si-min  LI Sha-xi  YUAN Jing  CHEN Chuan-tie  ZHAO Mei-fen  LIN Yi-min  PENG Zhong-tian
Institution:1.Department of Infectious Diseases, Third People "s Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518112, China; 2.Department of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University, Hengyang 421001, China)
Abstract:Objective To assessment the value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) and serological diagnosis model (Forns index, FIB-4, APRI) to liver fibrosis of chronic hepatic B. Methods Total of 111 patient confirmed as CHB, divided into groups according to the result of the liver biopsy: no significant liver ifbrosis group (S0, S1) 40 cases, signiifcantly ifbrosis group (≥S2) 48 cases, early cirrhosis group (S4) 23 cases. During the same period, each patient with the assessment of ARFI, Forns index, Fib-4 and APRI. Compared the correlation of noninvasive diagnosis model and liver biopsy. Moreover, analysis the diagnostic value of noninvasive liver ifbrosis model to the liver ifbrosis according to the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Results ARFI, Forns index, FIB-4, APRI, the four kinds of noninvasive diagnostic method has a good consistency with liver biopsy, and their Pearson correlation coefifcient were 0.882, 0.639, 0.589, 0.418. The assessment value of ARFI to signiifcantly ifbrosis group (≥S2) was superior to FIB-4 (Z=2.882, P=0.004;Z=3.215, P=0.001), APRI (Z=4.850, P<0.001;Z=3.198, P=0.001), Forns index (Z=2.182, P=0.029;Z=2.798, P=0.005). Conclusions The assessment value to signiifcantly ifbrosis and early cirrhosis of ARFI is higher than others and worthy of promotion.
Keywords:Noninvasive diagnosis  Chronic Hepatic B  Liver ifbrosis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号