首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

老年病人腹部手术后镇痛剂量的探讨
引用本文:施锋,李士通,沈浩.老年病人腹部手术后镇痛剂量的探讨[J].中国临床医学,2005,12(6):1119-1121.
作者姓名:施锋  李士通  沈浩
作者单位:上海交通大学附属第一人民医院麻醉科,上海,200080
摘    要:目的:探讨静脉和硬膜外镇痛用于老年病人腹部手术后镇痛的剂量。方法:全麻腹部手术病人120例,年龄65-99岁,随机分六组;V1~V3组术毕经静脉自控镇痛,药液配方为每100ml生理盐水内含曲马多501)mg、芬太尼0.5mg、氟哌利多2.5mg;负荷量和背景量分别为V.组2ml、1.0ml/h,Ⅵ组3ml、1.5ml/h,U组4ml、1.5ml/h。E1~E3组硬膜外自控镇痛,药液为每100ml内含吗啡5mg、布比卡因100mg、氟哌利多2.5mg;负荷量和背景量分别为E1组2ml、1.0ml/h,E2组3ml、1.5ml/h,E3组4ml、1.5ml/h。PCA单次量2ml、锁定时间10min。记录2h、6h、12h、24h、48h疼痛、镇静和总舒适评分、镇痛用药量、PCA按压次数、有效按压率(D/D)及不良反应发生率。结果:镇痛用药量:V1组〉V2组,U组〉V1组,E3组〉B组,E3组〉E1组(均P〈0.05)。按压次数:E1组〉E3组,E1组〉B组(P%0.05),其余各组间无显著性差异。有效按压率(D/D):静脉组中无显著差异,E1组〉E3组,E1组〉B组(均P%0.05)。疼痛评分:静脉组中无显著差异,E1组〉E3组,E1组〉R组(均P%0.05)。镇静评分:V1组〉V1组、V2组〉V1组(P〈0.05),硬膜外组中无显著差异。总舒适评分:E2组〉V1组(P〈0.05)。不良反应:恶心、呕吐V3组3次、B组4次,明显多于其他组;眩晕V3组4次;V1和V2组分别有4例和3例病人排气时问明显延长。结论:老年病人腹部手术后镇痛静脉组中,负荷量2ml、背景输注量1.0ml/h效果较佳。最适宜方式是吗啡硬膜外镇痛,剂量为:负荷量2~4ml、背景输注量1.2ml/h。

关 键 词:曲马多  吗啡  自控镇痛  老年人
文章编号:1008-6358(2005)06-1119-03

The Best Regimen of PCA in the Elderly Patients After Abdominal Operation
SHI Feng,LI Shitong,Shen Hao.The Best Regimen of PCA in the Elderly Patients After Abdominal Operation[J].Chinese Journal Of Clinical Medicine,2005,12(6):1119-1121.
Authors:SHI Feng  LI Shitong  Shen Hao
Abstract:Objective: To find the best regimen of PCIA and PCEA in the elderly patients with abdominal operatioa Methods: 120 randomized patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries, into 6 groups that received intravenous or epidural PCA with tramadol 500 mg, fentanyl0. 5mg and droperidol 2. 5 mg or epidural PCA with morphine 5 mg,bupivacaine 100mg and droperidol 2. 5 mg after operatioa Group V1 ,V2 and V3, were the intravenous groups and the loading doses were 2 ml,3 ml and 4ml, and continous infusion rate were 1. 0 ml/ h,1. 2 ml/h and 1. 5 ml/h respectively. Group E1 , E2 and E3 were the epidural groups. Their loading doses were 2 ml,3 ml and 4 ml and continous infusion rate were 1. 0 ml/h,1. 2 ml/h and 1. 5 ml/h respectively. Pain score, sedation score, total satisfaction score, analgesia solution consumption, PCA, demand/delivery(D/D) and adverse effect were recordeded for 48 hours. Results: Anesthetic consumption was in the following order: group V3>V1 , group V3>V2,group E3>E2, group E3>E1. Intra-group differences were statistically signifi-cant(F<0. 05). The pressing times: E1 >E3 ,E1 >E2 (P<0. 05). D/D of intravenous groups had no any significant differences. D/D of epidural groups was in the following order: E1 >E3, E1 >E2 (P<0. 05). Pain score of intravenous groups had no any significant differences. Pain score : E1 >E3, E1 >E2 (P<0. 05). Sedation score : V3>V1 ,V2>V1 (P<0. 05). Sedation score of epidural groups had no any significant differences. The total satisfaction score: E2>V1 (P<0. 05). The adverse effect : 3 and 4 patients felt nauseated or vomited in V3 and E3. 4 patients felt dizzy in V3. The bowel ventilation of 4 and 3 patients delayed in V3 and V2(P<0.05). Conclusion:Infusion at the rate of 1. 0 ml/h after a loading dose of 2 ml is likely a better regimen of tramadol PCIA in the elderly patients after abdominal operation. The best regimen of PCA was morphine PCEA at the rate of 1. 2 ml/h after a loading dose of 2-4 ml.
Keywords:Tramadol  Morphine  Patient-controlled analgesia(PCA)  Aged
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号