Pediatric cancer communication in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review |
| |
Authors: | Dylan E. Graetz MD MPH Marcela Garza MD Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo MD Jennifer W. Mack MD MPH |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee;2. Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee;3. Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee;4. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts |
| |
Abstract: | The burden of global childhood cancer lies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Communication is essential to pediatric cancer care, and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has defined 6 functions of communication between patients, family members, and providers, including 1) fostering healing relationships, 2) responding to emotions, 3) exchanging information, 4) making decisions, 5) managing uncertainty, and 6) enabling self-management. Nevertheless, communication needs and practices in LMICs remain incompletely understood. For this review, the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Turning Research Into Practice databases were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searching identified 2988 articles, with 11 added through snowballing. Forty articles met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, communication functions, enablers, barriers, and additional major themes. This review included work from 17 countries. Most studies (85%) used qualitative methodology; the number of participants ranged from 7 to 304. All 6 of the NCI-defined communication functions were identified in included studies, with rates ranging from 100% of studies for information exchange to 28% of studies for decision making. Communication barriers included cancer misconceptions, stigma, and hierarchy between parents and providers. Provider training and community education facilitated communication. Additional themes included disclosure to children, family dynamics, and the multidisciplinary health care team. In conclusion, all 6 of the communication functions defined by the NCI were applied by pediatric cancer researchers in LMICs. Additional barriers, enablers, and communication themes noted in LMICs deserve further exploration, and a relative paucity of research in comparison with high-income countries highlights the need for further work. |
| |
Keywords: | child communication developing countries neoplasms |
|
|