首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Applying protein-based amide proton transfer MR imaging to distinguish solitary brain metastases from glioblastoma
Authors:Hao?Yu,Huiling?Lou,Tianyu?Zou,Xianlong?Wang,Shanshan?Jiang,Zhongqing?Huang,Yongxing?Du,Chunxiu?Jiang,Ling?Ma,Jianbin?Zhu,Wen?He,Qihong?Rui,Jianyuan?Zhou,Zhibo?Wen  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:zhibowen@.com"   title="  zhibowen@.com"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author
Affiliation:1.Department of Radiology,Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,China;2.Department of Geriatrics,The First People’ Hospital of Guangzhou,Guangzhou,China;3.Department of Medical Image Center, Yuebei People’s Hospital,Shantou University Medical College,Shantou,China;4.Division of MR Research, Department of Radiology,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,USA
Abstract:

Objectives

To determine the utility of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MR imaging in distinguishing solitary brain metastases (SBMs) from glioblastomas (GBMs).

Methods

Forty-five patients with SBMs and 43 patients with GBMs underwent conventional and APT-weighted sequences before clinical intervention. The APTw parameters and relative APTw (rAPTw) parameters in the tumour core and the peritumoral brain zone (PBZ) were obtained and compared between SBMs and GBMs. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the best parameter for distinguishing between the two groups.

Results

The APTwmax, APTwmin, APTwmean, rAPTwmax, rAPTwmin or rAPTwmean values in the tumour core were not significantly different between the SBM and GBM groups (P?=?0.141, 0.361, 0.221, 0.305, 0.578 and 0.448, respectively). However, the APTwmax, APTwmin, APTwmean, rAPTwmax, rAPTwmin or rAPTwmean values in the PBZ were significantly lower in the SBM group than in the GBM group (P?min values had the highest area under the ROC curve 0.905 and accuracy 85.2% in discriminating between the two neoplasms.

Conclusion

As a noninvasive imaging method, APT-weighted MR imaging can be used to distinguish SBMs from GBMs.

Key Points

? APTw values in the tumour core were not different between SBMs and GBMs. ? APTw values in peritumoral brain zone were lower in SBMs than in GBMs. ? The APTw min was the best parameter to distinguish SBMs from GBMs.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号