Image Guidance for Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Angiography and Image Fusion |
| |
| Authors: | Vania Tacher MingDe Lin Pascal Desgranges Jean-Francois Deux Thijs Grünhagen Jean-Pierre Becquemin Alain Luciani Alain Rahmouni Hicham Kobeiter |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Medical Imaging Service, Interventional and Therapeutic Vascular and Oncologic Radiology Unit, Université Paris-Est Créteil, France;2. Vascular Surgery Service, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Henri Mondor, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France;3. Clinical Informatics, Interventional, and Translational Solutions, Philips Research North America, Briarcliff Manor, New York;4. Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands |
| |
| Abstract: | PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of image fusion (IF) of preprocedural arterial-phase computed tomography with intraprocedural fluoroscopy for roadmapping in endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms, and to compare this approach versus current roadmapping methods (ie, two-dimensional [2D] and three-dimensional [3D] angiography).Materials and MethodsThirty-seven consecutive patients with complex aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular techniques were retrospectively reviewed; these included aneurysms of digestive and/or renal arteries and pararenal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. All interventions were performed with the same angiographic system. According to the availability of different roadmapping software, patients were successively placed into three intraprocedural image guidance groups: (i) 2D angiography (n = 9), (ii) 3D rotational angiography (n = 14), and (iii) IF (n = 14). X-ray exposure (dose–area product [DAP]), injected contrast medium volume, and procedure time were recorded.ResultsPatient characteristics were similar among groups, with no statistically significant differences (P ≥ .05). There was no statistical difference in endograft deployment success between groups (2D angiography, eight of nine patients [89%]; 3D angiography and IF, 14 of 14 patients each [100%]). The IF group showed significant reduction (P < .0001) in injected contrast medium volume versus other groups (2D, 235 mL ± 145; 3D, 225 mL ± 119; IF, 65 mL ± 28). Mean DAP values showed no significant difference between groups (2D, 1,188 Gy·cm2 ± 1,067; 3D, 984 Gy·cm2 ± 581; IF, 655 Gy·cm2 ± 457; P = .18); nor did procedure times (2D, 233 min ± 123; 3D, 181 min ± 53; IF, 189 min ± 60; P = .59).ConclusionsThe use of IF-based roadmapping is a feasible technique for endovascular complex aneurysm repair associated with significant reduction of injected contrast agent volume and similar x-ray exposure and procedure time. |
| |
| Keywords: | DAP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" key0010" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" dose–area product DSA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" key0020" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" digital subtraction angiography EVAR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" key0030" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" endovascular aneurysm repair FOV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" key0040" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" field of view IF" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" key0050" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" image fusion 2D" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" key0070" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" two-dimensional 3D" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" key0060" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" three-dimensional |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
