Utility of Cone-Beam CT Imaging in Prostatic Artery Embolization

PurposeTo evaluate the utility of cone-beam computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing prostatic artery (PA) embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Materials and MethodsFrom January 2012 to January 2013, 15 patients (age range, 59–81 y; mean, 68 y) with moderate- or severe-grade lower urinary tract symptoms, in whom medical management had failed were enrolled in a prospective United States trial to evaluate PAE. During pelvic angiography, 15 cone-beam CT acquisitions were performed in 11 patients, and digital subtraction angiography was performed in all patients. Cone-beam CT images were reviewed to assess for sites of potential nontarget embolization that impacted therapy, a pattern of enhancement on cone-beam CT suggesting additional PAs, confirmation of prostatic parenchymal perfusion before embolization, and contralateral prostatic parenchymal enhancement.ResultsCone-beam CT was successful in 14 of 15 acquisitions, and PAE was successful in 14 of 15 patients (92%). Cone-beam CT provided information that impacted treatment in five of 11 patients (46%) by allowing for identification of sites of potential nontarget embolization. Duplicated prostatic arterial supply and contralateral perfusion were each identified in 21% of patients (three of 11). Prostatic perfusion was confirmed before embolization in 50% of acquisitions (seven of 14).ConclusionsCone-beam CT is a useful technique that can potentially mitigate the risk of nontarget embolization. During treatment, it can allow for the interventionalist to identify duplicated prostatic arterial supply or contralateral perfusion, which may be useful when evaluating a treatment failure.