Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced US, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

Purpose:

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CE‐CT), contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography (CE‐US), superparamagnetic iron oxide‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (SPIO‐MRI), and gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI (Gd‐EOB‐MRI) in the evaluation of colorectal hepatic metastases.

Materials and Methods:

In all, 111 patients with colorectal cancers were enrolled in this study. Of the 112 metastases identified in 46 patients, 31 in 18 patients were confirmed histologically and the remaining 81 in 28 patients were confirmed by follow‐up imaging. CE‐CT, CE‐US, SPIO‐MRI, and Gd‐EOB‐MRI were evaluated. Mean (of three readers, except for CE‐US) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A_z), sensitivities, and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated. Each value was compared to the others by variance z‐test or chi‐square test with Bonferroni correction.

Results:

For all lesions, mean A_z and sensitivity of Gd‐EOB‐MRI (0.992, 95% 56/59]) were significantly greater than those of CE‐CT (0.847, 63% 71/112]) and CE‐US (0.844, 73% 77/106]). For lesions ≤1 cm, mean A_z and sensitivity of Gd‐EOB‐MRI (0.999, 92% 22/24]) were significantly greater than those of CE‐CT (0.685, 26% 13/50]) and CE‐US (0.7, 41% 18/44]). Mean A_z (95% CI) of SPIO‐MRI for all lesions (0.966 0.929–0.987]) and lesions ≤ 1 cm (0.961 0.911–0.988]) were significantly greater than those of CE‐CT and CE‐US. Mean sensitivity of SPIO‐MRI for lesions ≤1 cm (63%, 26/41) was significantly greater than that of CE‐CT.

Conclusion:

Gd‐EOB‐MRI and SPIO‐MRI were more accurate than CE‐CT and CE‐US for evaluation of liver metastasis in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.