Evaluation of the PET component of simultaneous [18F]choline PET/MRI in prostate cancer: comparison with [18F]choline PET/CT

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the positron emission tomography (PET) component of [¹⁸F]choline PET/MRI and compare it with the PET component of [¹⁸F]choline PET/CT in patients with histologically proven prostate cancer and suspected recurrent prostate cancer.

Methods

Thirty-six patients were examined with simultaneous [¹⁸F]choline PET/MRI following combined [¹⁸F]choline PET/CT. Fifty-eight PET-positive lesions in PET/CT and PET/MRI were evaluated by measuring the maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV_max and SUV_mean) using volume of interest (VOI) analysis. A scoring system was applied to determine the quality of the PET images of both PET/CT and PET/MRI. Agreement between PET/CT and PET/MRI regarding SUV_max and SUV_mean was tested using Pearson’s product-moment correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results

All PET-positive lesions that were visible on PET/CT were also detectable on PET/MRI. The quality of the PET images was comparable in both groups. Median SUV_max and SUV_mean of all lesions were significantly lower in PET/MRI than in PET/CT (5.2 vs 6.1, p?p?max of PET/CT and PET/MRI (R?=?0.86, p?mean of PET/CT and PET/MRI (R?=?0.81, p?max of PET/CT vs PET/MRI and ?1.12 to +2.23 between SUV_mean of PET/CT vs PET/MRI.

Conclusion

PET image quality of PET/MRI was comparable to that of PET/CT. A highly significant correlation between SUV_max and SUV_mean was found. Both SUV_max and SUV_mean were significantly lower in [¹⁸F]choline PET/MRI than in [¹⁸F]choline PET/CT. Differences of SUV_max and SUV_mean might be caused by different techniques of attenuation correction. Furthermore, differences in biodistribution and biokinetics of [¹⁸F]choline between the subsequent examinations and in the respective organ systems have to be taken into account.