首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Forensic identification of urine samples: a comparison between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers
Authors:V Castella  N Dimo-Simonin  C Brandt-Casadevall  N Robinson  M Saugy  F Taroni  P Mangin
Institution:(1) Laboratoire de Génétique Forensique, Institut Universitaire de Médecine Légale, rue du Bugnon 21, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland;(2) Laboratoire Suisse d'Analyse du Dopage, Institut Universitaire de Médecine Légale, rue du Bugnon 21, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland;(3) Ecole des Sciences Criminelles, BCH, Université de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Abstract:Urine samples from 20 male volunteers of European Caucasian origin were stored at 4°C over a 4-month period in order to compare the identification potential of nuclear DNA (nDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers. The amount of nDNA recovered from urines dramatically declined over time. Consequently, nDNA likelihood ratios (LRs) greater than 1,000 were obtained for 100, 70 and 55% of the urines analysed after 6, 60 and 120 days, respectively. For the mtDNA, HVI and HVII sequences were obtained for all samples tested, whatever the period considered. Nevertheless, the highest mtDNA LR of 435 was relatively low compared to its nDNA equivalent. Indeed, LRs obtained with only three nDNA loci could easily exceed this value and are quite easier to obtain. Overall, the joint use of nDNA and mtDNA markers enabled the 20 urine samples to be identified, even after the 4-month period. Electronic supplementary material Supplementary material is available for this article at .
Keywords:Doping control  Urine samples  Nuclear DNA  Mitochondrial DNA  Evidence evaluation
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号