首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Augmenting advance care planning in poor prognosis cancer with a video decision aid: a preintervention-postintervention study
Authors:Volandes Angelo E  Levin Tomer T  Slovin Susan  Carvajal Richard D  O'Reilly Eileen M  Keohan Mary Louise  Theodoulou Maria  Dickler Maura  Gerecitano John F  Morris Michael  Epstein Andrew S  Naka-Blackstone Anastazia  Walker-Corkery Elizabeth S  Chang Yuchiao  Noy Ariela
Affiliation:General Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. avolandes@partners.org
Abstract:

BACKGROUND:

The authors tested whether an educational video on the goals of care in advanced cancer (life‐prolonging care, basic care, or comfort care) helped patients understand these goals and had an impact on their preferences for resuscitation.

METHODS:

A survey of 80 patients with advanced cancer was conducted before and after they viewed an educational video. The outcomes of interest included changes in goals of care preference and knowledge and consistency of preferences with code status.

RESULTS:

Before viewing the video, 10 patients (13%) preferred life‐prolonging care, 24 patients (30%) preferred basic care, 29 patients (36%) preferred comfort care, and 17 patients (21%) were unsure. Preferences did not change after the video, when 9 patients (11%) chose life‐prolonging care, 28 patients (35%) chose basic care, 29 patients (36%) chose comfort care, and, 14 patients (18%) were unsure (P = .28). Compared with baseline, after the video presentation, more patients did not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (71% vs 62%; P = .03) or ventilation (80% vs 67%; P = .008). Knowledge about goals of care and likelihood of resuscitation increased after the video (P < .001). Of the patients who did not want CPR or ventilation after the video augmentation, only 4 patients (5%) had a documented do‐not‐resuscitate order in their medical record (kappa statistic, ?0.01; 95% confidence interval, ?0.06 to 0.04). Acceptability of the video was high.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with advanced cancer did not change care preferences after viewing the video, but fewer wanted CPR or ventilation. Documented code status was inconsistent with patient preferences. Patients were more knowledgeable after the video, reported that the video was acceptable, and said they would recommend it to others. The current results indicated that this type of video may enable patients to visualize “goals of care,” enriching patient understanding of worsening health states and better informing decision making. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
Keywords:decision‐making  video decision aids  end‐of‐life decision‐making  advanced cancer  advance care planning  code status  resuscitation  preferences
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号