冠状动脉内应用维拉帕米对急性心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后冠状动脉灌注、心肌灌注和临床预后的影响

目的探讨急性ST段抬高性心肌梗死（STEMI）急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）时冠状动脉内应用维拉帕米对冠状动脉灌注、心肌灌注及临床预后的影响。方法本研究为前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照性临床研究。连续性入选99例STEMI拟行急诊PCI的患者,随机分为维拉帕米组与对照组。在支架释放后即刻,维拉帕米组在靶血管内注入维拉帕米200μg,对照组在靶血管内注入肝素生理盐水,比较两组PCI术前、术后和冠状动脉内注药后的冠状动脉灌注和心肌灌注的差别。冠状动脉灌注以心外膜TIMI血流（TFG）和校正的TIMI血流帧数计数（CTFC）来评价。心肌灌注以TIMI心肌灌注分级（TMPG）和心肌灌注显影（MBG）来评价。并比较两组在PCI术后1周心脏彩色超声结果、住院期间以及随访期间主要心脏不良事件（MACE）发生率上的差别。结果最终91例患者有完整资料,其中维拉帕米组47例,对照组44例,两组临床基本特征和造影特征相仿。维拉帕米组和对照组在术前和支架释放后即刻冠状动脉灌注和心肌灌注各指标差异均无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。冠状动脉内注入维拉帕米后,维拉帕米组的CTFC、TFG、MBG、TMPG均较对照组有显著改善,分别为CTFC：27.1±14.2比39.0±23.8,P=0.011;TFG≥2级：100%比90.9%,P=0.035;MBG≥2级：91.5%%比75.5%,P=0.034;TMPG≥2级：89.4%比72.7%,P=0.042。维拉帕米组和对照组PCI术后1周时左室射血分数（63.4%±8.2%比63.5%±10.3%,P=0.578）、院内MACE发生率（4.3%比9.1%,P=0.613）和3个月MACE发生率（23.9%比22.7%,P=0.894）差异均无统计学意义。结论STEMI患者急诊行PCI治疗时,冠状动脉内应用维拉帕米可显著改善冠状动脉灌注和心肌灌注水平,但未观察到其对急诊PCI术后心室重构和短期临床预后的显著影响。

Effect of intracoronary verapamil on coronary flow, myocardial perfusion and clinical outcome during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

Objective To compare the effects of intracoronary verapamil on coronary flow,myocardial perfusion and clinical outcome during primary percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI） for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction（STEMI）.Methods A total of 99 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to receive intracoronary verapamil or intracoronary heparinised saline immediately after stent deployment.Coronary flow was assessed by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction（TIMI） flow grade（TFG） and corrected TIMI frame count（CTFC）,and myocardial perfusion was assessed by TIMI myocardial perfusion grade（TMPG） and TIMI myocardial blush grades（MBG）.Coronary and myocardial perfusion were assessed before and after PCI,as well as after drug administration by two doctors independently.Echocardiography were performed one week after PCI.Incidence of major adverse cardiac events in hospital and 3 months follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results Eight patients were excluded from the final analysis.Among the remaining 91 patients,47 patients were in the verapamil group and 44 patients were in control group.Baseline characteristics and angiographic characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups.CTFC,TFG,TMPG,and MBG before and after PCI were of no significant differences between the two groups.However,after drug administration,the verapamil group showed better outcome compared with the control group in CTFC（27.1±14.2 vs 39.0±23.8,P=0.011）,TFG≥2（100% vs 90.9%,P=0.035）,MBG≥2（91.5%% vs 75.5%,P=0.034）,and TMPG≥2（89.4% vs 72.7%,P=0.042）.LVEF measured by echocardiography was not significantly different between the two groups one week after PCI.The combined incidence of MACE in hospital（4.3% vs 9.1%,P=0.613） and at 3-month follow-up（23.9% vs 22.7%,P=0.894） was similar between the verapamil group and the control group.Conclusion Intracoronary administration of verapamil can improve coronary flow and myocardial perfusion