首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

研究生学位论文答辩工作存在的问题与对策
引用本文:邢茂迎,杨美华,孙亚林,程传苗.研究生学位论文答辩工作存在的问题与对策[J].医学教育探索,2009,8(11):1331-1333.
作者姓名:邢茂迎  杨美华  孙亚林  程传苗
作者单位:第二军医大学东方肝胆外科医院医教部,上海,200438
摘    要:学位论文答辩是检验研究生培养质量的最后环节,严格做好学位论文答辩工作有助于提高研究生培养质量。现行的学位论文答辩工作中存在着人情关系比例重、预答辩工作流于形式和答辩专家难以聘请等问题。针对上述问题,笔者提出建立评阅专家库,推行论文“双盲”评审制度、组织两次预答辩和从医院层面统一组织答辩专家等改进措施,并将其应用于实际工作中,取得了较好的效果。

关 键 词:学位论文答辩  评审制度  评阅专家库

Problems and countermeasures in academic oral defense system
XING Mao-ying,YANG Mei-hua,SUN Ya-lin,CHENG Chuan-miao.Problems and countermeasures in academic oral defense system[J].Researches in Medical Education,2009,8(11):1331-1333.
Authors:XING Mao-ying  YANG Mei-hua  SUN Ya-lin  CHENG Chuan-miao
Institution:.( Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University,Shanghai 200438, China)
Abstract:As the final link of quality evaluation of postgraduates' cultivation, academic oral defense system should be strictly organized to promote the training quality. Many problems such as formality of pre-defense, high proportion of personal relations and difficulty invitation for defensive experts exist in the current academic oral defense system. Aiming at the problems, the author puts forward corresponding countermeasures for the actual improvement including estab- lishment of defensive experts bank, donble-blind evaluation system of papers , twice arrange- ments of pre-defense and unified organization of defensive experts on hospital level.
Keywords:Academic oral defense  Evaluation system of papers  Defensive experts bank
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号