Effects of dual antibacterial agents MDPB and nano-silver in primer on microcosm biofilm,cytotoxicity and dentine bond properties |
| |
Authors: | Ke Zhang Lei Cheng Satoshi Imazato Joseph M. Antonucci Nancy J. Lin Sheng Lin-Gibson Yuxing Bai Hockin H.K. Xu |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering Division, Department of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;2. Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China;3. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;4. Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka, Japan;5. Biomaterials Group, Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA;6. Center for Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;7. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD 21250, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to investigate the effects of dentine primer containing dual antibacterial agents, namely, 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) and nanoparticles of silver (NAg), on dentine bond strength, dental plaque microcosm biofilm response, and fibroblast cytotoxicity for the first time.MethodsScotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP) was used as the parent bonding agent. Four primers were tested: SBMP primer control (referred to as “P”), P + 5% MDPB, P + 0.05% NAg, and P + 5% MDPB + 0.05% NAg. Dentine shear bond strengths were measured using extracted human teeth. Biofilms from the mixed saliva of 10 donors were cultured to investigate metabolic activity, colony-forming units (CFU), and lactic acid production. Human fibroblast cytotoxicity of the four primers was tested in vitro.ResultsIncorporating MDPB and NAg into primer did not reduce dentine bond strength compared to control (p > 0.1). SEM revealed well-bonded adhesive–dentine interfaces with numerous resin tags. MDPB or NAg each greatly reduced biofilm viability and acid production, compared to control. Dual agents MDPB + NAg had a much stronger effect than either agent alone (p < 0.05), increasing inhibition zone size and reducing metabolic activity, CFU and lactic acid by an order of magnitude, compared to control. There was no difference in cytotoxicity between commercial control and antibacterial primers (p > 0.1).ConclusionsThe method of using dual agents MDPB + NAg in the primer yielded potent antibacterial properties. Hence, this method may be promising to combat residual bacteria in tooth cavity and invading bacteria at the margins. The dual agents MDPB + NAg may have wide applicability to other adhesives, composites, sealants and cements to inhibit biofilms and caries. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|