| 全人照护模式在老年肺癌患者康复护理中的应用 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 彭翠娥,;谌永毅,;王卫红,;周莲清,;沈波涌,;袁烨,;胡阳元.全人照护模式在老年肺癌患者康复护理中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2014(18):2188-2191. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 彭翠娥 ;谌永毅 ;王卫红 ;周莲清 ;沈波涌 ;袁烨 ;胡阳元 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]湖南省肿瘤医院中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院肿瘤整形外科,长沙410013; [2]湖南省肿瘤医院中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院护理部,长沙410013; [3]湖南师范大学医学院护理系,长沙410013; [4]湖南省肿瘤医院中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院妇瘤二科,长沙410013; [5]湖南省肿瘤医院中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院头颈放疗科,长沙410013; [6]湖南省肿瘤医院中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院胸外一科,长沙410013 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 湖南省科技厅课题（2014SK3137）;2010年卫生部国家临床重点专科临床护理建设项目（卫办医政函[2011]271号） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：探讨全人照护模式在老年肺癌患者康复护理中的应用效果。方法将84例老年肺癌患者随机分为对照组和干预组各42例，对照组采用常规的整体护理模式康复护理，干预组在常规此基础上实施全人照护模式，采用生命质量测评量表（ FACT）、抑郁自评量表（ SDS）、焦虑自评量表（ SAS）评价两组护理效果。结果干预前两组患者FACT各分量表评分及SDS、SAS评分比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0．05）；干预后干预组FACT各分量表评分分别为（69．99±1．45），（69．87±2．54），（70．24±1．36），（69．25±2．02），（68．24±1．41）分，均高于对照组与干预前，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0．05）；对照组干预前后FACT各分量表评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0．05）；干预后干预组患者SDS、SAS评分分别为（33．893±4．257），（29．754±3．896）分，均低于对照组（39．450±5．058），（34．639±5．785）分，差异均有统计学意义（t值分别为-1．023，1．903；P＜0．05）。结论全人照护模式对提高肺癌患者的整体生存质量具有积极意义，值得临床推广。
|
| 关 键 词： | 肺肿瘤 老年人 康复护理 全人照护模式 |
Application of four integrated nursing model in rehabilitation nursing of elderly patients with lung cancer |
| |
| Institution: | Peng Cuie, Chen Yongyi, Wang Weihong, Zhou Lianqing, Shen Yongbo, Yuan Ye, Hu Yangyuan (Department of Tumor Plastic Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, the Affiliate-d Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To explore the application effect of four integrated nursing model in rehabilitation nursing of elderly patients with lung cancer .Methods Eighty-four elderly patients with lung cancer were chosen and were randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group , each with 42 cases.The control group received the routine holistic nursing mode , and the intervention group received the four integrated nursing model on the basis of the control group .The nursing effect was evaluated by the FACT , self-rating depression scale （ SDS ） and self -rating anxiety scale （ SAS ） in two groups .Results No differences were found in the scores of FACT , SDS, SAS between two group before the intervention （P〉0.05）. The scores of every scales of FACT were respectively （69.99 ±1.45）, （69.87 ±2.54）, （70.24 ±1.36）, （69.25 ±2.02）, （68.24 ±1.41） in the intervention group after the intervention , and were higher than those of the control group and those before the intervention （P〈0.05）.No differences were found in the scores of every scales of FACT in the control group before and after the intervention （P〉0.05）.The scores of SDS and SAS were respectively （33.893 ±4.257）, （29.754 ±3.896） in the intervention group after the intervention , and were lower than （39.450 ±5.058）, （34.639 ±5.785） in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant （t=-1.023,1.903, respectively;P〈0.05）.Conclusions The four integrated nursing model has a positive significance on the improvement of the overall quality of life in patients with lung cancer , and is worthy of the clinical promotion . |
| |
| Keywords: | Lung cancer Elderly Rehabilitation nursing Four integrated nursing model |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
