首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体-抗体融合蛋白对炎性关节炎患者关节置换术后恢复的影响
引用本文:刘升云,贺玉杰,张磊,王义生,刘传慧. 重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体-抗体融合蛋白对炎性关节炎患者关节置换术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2011, 15(6). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-7480.2011.06.004
作者姓名:刘升云  贺玉杰  张磊  王义生  刘传慧
作者单位:1. 郑州大学第一附属医院肾病风湿科,450052
2. 郑州大学第一附属医院骨科,450052
3. 郑州市骨科医院内科
摘    要:目的 探讨重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体-抗体融合蛋白(rhTNFR:Fc)对炎性关节炎患者关节置换术后恢复的影响.方法 回顾分析67例应用rhTNFR:Fc或传统改变病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)治疗的炎性关节炎患者行关节置换术后伤口感染发生例数、伤口愈合时间、炎症期时间(体温≥37.5 ℃)及抗生素应用时间.根据所应用药物分为rhTNFR:Fc组和传统DMARDs组.其中,rhTNFR:Fc组单用rhTNFR:Fc或rhTNFR:Fc联合传统DMARDs;传统DMARDs组单用或联合应用2种或2种以上传统DMARDs.统计学处理根据数据类型选择t检验或非参数检验.结果 67例患者中,rhTNFR:Fc组18例,传统DMARDs组49例.rhTNFR:Fc组1例出现伤口感染,传统DMARDs组0例,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).rhTNFR:Fc组炎症期时间为(4±3) d,传统DMARDs组为(3±3)d,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).rhTNFR:Fc组伤口愈合时间为(14.0±3.1)d,传统DMARDs组为(14.7±2.9)d,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).rhTNFR:Fc组术后抗生素应用时间为(14.8±9.3)d,传统DMARDs组为(10.3±2.7)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 炎性关节炎患者围手术期应用rhTNFR:Fc不增加关节置换术后伤口感染发生率,不延长伤口愈合时间及炎症期时间.
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the affect of rhTNFR:Fc on the postoperative recovery of patients with inflammatory arthritis after arthroplasty. Methods Patients with inflammatory arthritis undergoing arthroplasty were included and divided into rhTNFR:Fc group (rhTNFR:Fc only or combined with conven-tional DMARDs) and conventional DMARDs group (monotherapy with or combination of conventional DMARDs). We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postoperative infection, wound healing time, the febrile period (body temperature ≥37.5 ℃) and the duration of antibiotics treatment after arthroplasty. x2 test and t test were used for statistical analysis. Results Sixty-seven patients were included, 18 in the rhTNFR: Fc group and 49 in the conventional DMARDs group. One postoperative infection occurred in rhTNFR :Fc group but none in the DMARDs group. There was no significant difference by Fisher's exact test (P>0.05). The febrile duration was (4±3) days in the rhTNFR :Fc group and (3±3) days in the conventional DMARDs group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The wound healing time was (14.0±3.1) days in the rhTNFR :Fc group and (14.7±2.9) days in the conventional DMARDs group, which was not statistically different(P>0.05). The duration of antibiotics treatment after operation was (14.8±9.3) days in the rhTNFR: Fc group and (10.3±2.7) days in the conventional DMARDs group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Using rhTNFR:Fc during perioperative period in patients with inflammatory arthritis does not increase the risk of infectious complications or extending wound healing time and the febrile duration.

关 键 词:受体,肿瘤坏死因子,Ⅱ型  关节炎  感染  伤口愈合

Affect of rhTNFR:Fc on postoperative recovery of patients with inflammatory arthritis
LIU Sheng-yun,HE Yu-jie,ZHANG Lei,WANG Yi-sheng,LIU Chuan-hui. Affect of rhTNFR:Fc on postoperative recovery of patients with inflammatory arthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rheumatology, 2011, 15(6). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-7480.2011.06.004
Authors:LIU Sheng-yun  HE Yu-jie  ZHANG Lei  WANG Yi-sheng  LIU Chuan-hui
Abstract:Objective To investigate the affect of rhTNFR:Fc on the postoperative recovery of patients with inflammatory arthritis after arthroplasty. Methods Patients with inflammatory arthritis undergoing arthroplasty were included and divided into rhTNFR:Fc group (rhTNFR:Fc only or combined with conven-tional DMARDs) and conventional DMARDs group (monotherapy with or combination of conventional DMARDs). We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postoperative infection, wound healing time, the febrile period (body temperature ≥37.5 ℃) and the duration of antibiotics treatment after arthroplasty. x2 test and t test were used for statistical analysis. Results Sixty-seven patients were included, 18 in the rhTNFR: Fc group and 49 in the conventional DMARDs group. One postoperative infection occurred in rhTNFR :Fc group but none in the DMARDs group. There was no significant difference by Fisher's exact test (P>0.05). The febrile duration was (4±3) days in the rhTNFR :Fc group and (3±3) days in the conventional DMARDs group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The wound healing time was (14.0±3.1) days in the rhTNFR :Fc group and (14.7±2.9) days in the conventional DMARDs group, which was not statistically different(P>0.05). The duration of antibiotics treatment after operation was (14.8±9.3) days in the rhTNFR: Fc group and (10.3±2.7) days in the conventional DMARDs group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Using rhTNFR:Fc during perioperative period in patients with inflammatory arthritis does not increase the risk of infectious complications or extending wound healing time and the febrile duration.
Keywords:Receptors,tumor necrosis factor,type Ⅱ  Arthritis  Infection  Wound healing
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号