首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种分析miRNA相对表达量方法的比较研究
引用本文:郑传浩,姚磊,李毅. 两种分析miRNA相对表达量方法的比较研究[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2013, 0(22): 2937-2938,2942
作者姓名:郑传浩  姚磊  李毅
作者单位:第三军医大学新桥医院检验科,重庆400037
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81201356).
摘    要:目的基于实时反转录一聚合酶链反应(RT—PCR)基因表达相对定量的分析方法:GenEx软件分析与2(-△△CT)法,建立一种简便、准确的miRNA相对定量方法。方法以HK-2细胞系cDNA为模板,进行PCR扩增,确定最佳退火温度;再倍比稀释该模板,用荧光定量PCR测定的ct值作miR-122和miR-16的标准曲线,计算出相应miRNA的扩增效率。用荧光定量PCR测定健康者和乙型肝炎患者血清中内参miR-16和靶基因miR-122的表达,分别采用GenEx软件分析与2(-△△CT)法来评价相对表达量。结果系列稀释法制作的标准曲线呈现较好的线性相关性,两种miRNA的标准曲线r2值均为0.999,miR-16的扩增效率为97%,miR-122扩增效率为107%。2(-△△CT)法分析乙型肝炎患者血清中miR-122的表达较健康者增高了44.3倍,而GenEx软件分析为54.1倍。结论GenEx软件分析考虑了更多的影响因素,其结果比(-△△CT法更可靠,适用于临床分析。

关 键 词:实时RT-PCR  相对定量  标准曲线

Comparative study on two analysis methods of miRNA relative expression
ZHENG Chuan-hao,YAO Lei,LI Yi. Comparative study on two analysis methods of miRNA relative expression[J]. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, 2013, 0(22): 2937-2938,2942
Authors:ZHENG Chuan-hao  YAO Lei  LI Yi
Affiliation:(Laboratory Department ,Xinqiao Hospital of Third Military Medical University ,Chongqing 400037 ,China)
Abstract:Objective Based on the data obtained from the real-time RT-PCR,there are two methods for analy- sis: GenEx software analysis and 2(-△△CT) method. This study is to establish a simpIe and accurate microRNA relative quantitative method. Methods To determine the optimal annealing temperature,we amplified HK-2 cell line cDNA by PCR. Standard curve of miR-122 and miR-16 were made from the 10-fold diluted cDNA template from HK-2 cells. According to the curve,calculate respective miRNA amplification efficiency. The expression of target gene miR- 122 and reference gene miR-16 were determined by quantitative PCR. Base on the Ct data, the GenEx software analy- sis and 2〈-aacT) method were used to evaluate the miR-122 relative expression rate in the sera of healthy subjects and hepatitis B patients. Results A good linear correlation (r2 =0. 999) was obtained from two standard curve of miRNA genes. The amplification efficiency of miR-16 and miR-122 were 97 % and 107%, respectively. The expression of miR- 122 that 2(-△△CT) analysis received was 44.3 times higher in the serum of hepatitis B patients compared with healthy controls. But the rate that GenEx software analysis obtained was 54. 1. Conclusion Because the GenEx software a- nalysis considered more factors, so the result was more reliable and suitable for clinical application.
Keywords:real-time RT-PCR  relative quantification  standard curve
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号