ObjectiveThis study evaluates the effectiveness of technology versus in-person, group-initiated diabetes prevention to enhance comprehension of learning objectives between patients with differing health literacy (HL).MethodsEvidence-based content through either a DVD (n?=?217) or in-person, group class (n?=?225) to initiate the intervention. A teach-back call was used to assess comprehension of, and reinforce, learning objectives. Chi-squared was used to determine differences between conditions (DVD vs Class) and HL levels (High n?=?361 vs. Low n?=?81) and regression analyses were used to examine relationships.ResultsDVD participants performed significantly better across teach back questions (15.4?±?2.5 v. 14.8?±?2.6, p?<?0.01), demonstrated comprehension in fewer teach-back rounds (1.9?±?0.7 v. 2.1?±?0.7, p?<?0.01), and answered more questions correctly on the first try (4.2?±?1.6 v. 3.4?±?1.8, p?<?0.01). Models for HL levels and modality by HL level were statistically significant (p?<?0.01) favoring the DVD.ConclusionInitiating a diabetes prevention program with the use of a DVD appears to be a superior option to in-person, class sessions. Teach-back and teach-to-goal strategies enables participants of both high and low health literacy levels to receive and confirm mastery of diabetes prevention objectives.Practice ImplicationsA teach-back call may improve information uptake increasing the likelihood of health behavior uptake. |