Evaluation of the VITEK 2 cards for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of non‐glucose‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli |
| |
Authors: | WEN‐SHYANG HSIEH LING‐LING SUNG KUN‐CHOU TSAI HSIN‐TSUNG HO |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital,Taipei;2. Mackay Medicine, Nursing and Management College, Taipei, Taiwan |
| |
Abstract: | We evaluated VITEK 2 cards (NGNC and AST‐GN10) for the accuracy of identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of non‐glucose‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli (NGF‐GNB). In a total of 201 strains, 190 strains (94.5%) were correctly identified, seven strains (3.5%) showed low discrimination, four strains (2.0%) had discrepancies, and no strain remained unidentified. Reference AST of amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, levofloxacin, piperacillin‐tazobactam, and trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole was performed by the agar dilution method. Approximately 82.5% of ID and 72.9% of AST were completed within 7 and 14 h, respectively. For NGF‐GNB, other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and the Burkholderia cepacia group, essential agreements (EAs) were 93.6–100.0%. Severe disagreements (resistant by the reference method to susceptible by AST‐GN10) were observed for amikacin (0.9%), cefepime (1.8%), cefotaxime (1.8%), imipenem (0.9%), and piperacillin‐tazobactam (0.9%). One major disagreement (susceptible to resistant) was observed for ceftazidime (0.1%). For P. aeruginosa, EAs were 85.7–100%, with severe disagreements observed for cefepime (4.8%) and piperacillin‐tazobactam (4.8%). For Acinetobacter spp., EAs were 86.4–100% without disagreements. The VITEK 2 cards appear to be promising for rapid ID and reliable AST for most species of NGF‐GNB. |
| |
Keywords: | Vitek 2 non‐glucose‐fermenting GNB ID AST |
|
|