普利生全自动动态血沉仪与魏氏法测定血沉结果的比较

目的：对北京普利生全自动动态血沉测试仪与魏氏法测定红细胞沉降率（ESR,简称血沉）的结果进行比较,以评价北京普利生全自动动态血沉测试仪测定血沉结果的可靠性。方法：随机抽取40名门诊患者,抽取患者静脉血,分别用北京普利生全自动动态血沉测试仪与魏氏法检测血沉,并对测定的结果进行统计学分析与比较。结果：经统计学处理后,两种方法的测定结果,在正常值范围内,结果基本一致,但当血沉结果大于20 mm/h时,魏氏法测定的结果高于仪器法,并且随着测定值的升高,二者之间的差异越显著。结论：北京普利生全自动动态血沉测试仪测定正常标本结果与手工法接近,而对血沉升高的异常标本则手工法测定结果更可靠。

Evaluation of the comparison between Precil XC-20 Automated Analyzer and classical Weishi methods in detecting erythrocyte sedimentation rate

Objective：To compare the result of Pulisheng automated dynamic analyzer and classical weishi methods in detecting erythrocyte sedimentation rate（ESR）,and to evaluate the reliability of Precil XC-20 Automated erythrocyte sedimentation rate Analyzer.Methods：Forty outpatients were selected randomly and detected erythrocyte sedimentation rate with Precil XC-20 Automated erythrocyte sedimentation rate Analyzer and traditional Weishi method,and the data were statistically analyzed and compared.Results：As far as the results were in the range of normal,there were no significant difference between results from two methods.But when the results were beyond the range of 20 mm/h,the results from Weishi method were higher than those from analyzer,and the higher the results the more significant the difference.Conclusion：Precil XC-20 Automated erythrocyte sedimentation rate Analyzer is as good as Weishi method in detecting normal blood sample,but not so good in detecting abnormal blood sample.