首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Valsartan/Amlodipine Compared to Nifedipine GITS in Patients with Hypertension Inadequately Controlled by Monotherapy
Authors:Ji-Guang Wang  Wei-Fang Zeng  Yu-Song He  Liang-Long Chen  Meng Wei  Zhao-Ping Li  Bao-Wei Zhang  Yan Li
Affiliation:1. Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, Shanghai Key Lab of Hypertension, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Beijing, China
3. Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Union Hospital, Provincial Institute of Coronary Artery Disease, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
4. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China
5. Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides of the Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
6. Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
Abstract:

Introduction

Current hypertension guidelines recommend single-pill combinations because they not only improve convenience and compliance to therapy and thus blood pressure (BP) control, but also reduce health-care costs. This study compared the efficacy and safety of valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination with nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) in Chinese patients with hypertension who were inadequately controlled with monotherapy.

Methods

In this multicenter, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study, 564 patients with hypertension not adequately controlled by prior monotherapy were randomized to receive valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg or nifedipine GITS 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks.

Results

In the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 540), valsartan/amlodipine (n = 272) showed a least-square mean reduction of ?16.6 versus ?10.8 mmHg by nifedipine GITS (n = 268; mean between-treatment difference: ?5.8 mmHg; P < 0.0001) from baseline to week 12. The corresponding results for mean sitting diastolic BP were ?8.6 and ?4.6 mmHg, respectively (difference: ?4.0 mmHg; P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients achieving the BP target (<140/90 or <130/80 mmHg in the absence or presence of diabetes mellitus, respectively) was significantly higher with valsartan/amlodipine (79.0%) versus nifedipine GITS (57.4%; P < 0.0001). The overall incidence rate of adverse events was lower with valsartan/amlodipine (19.2%) than with nifedipine GITS (29.4%; P = 0.004).

Conclusion

The valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg single-pill combination is well tolerated and more effective than nifedipine GITS 30 mg for BP control in Chinese patients with hypertension.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号