首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


A Method for Standardizing Procedures in Rehabilitation: Use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors:David M Morris  Edward Taub  David M Macrina  Edwin W Cook  Brian F Geiger
Institution:a Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
b Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
c Department of Human Studies, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
d Center for Educational Accountability, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
e Research Service, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL
Abstract:Morris DM, Taub E, Macrina DM, Cook EW, Geiger BF. A method for standardizing procedures in rehabilitation: use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation multisite randomized controlled trial.

Objective

An enduring problem in the field of rehabilitation has been the lack of standardization in the protocols of treatments and tests. To develop a process evaluation method to standardize the administration of rehabilitation procedures used in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial, a randomized controlled trial of upper-extremity constraint-induced therapy implemented across 7 sites.

Design

Process evaluation.

Setting

Research laboratory.

Participants

Convenience sample or research personnel.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Checklist scoring sheets were developed to rate videotapes using systematic application of prescribed steps for each of 5 procedures across 3 time periods. Time periods were immediately after training, and 1 and 2 years later. A performance score of at least 90% was required before individual research personnel were allowed to participate in the trial.

Results

Overall performance scores ranged from 85.8% to 95% of performance items correctly executed. There was a significant improvement in standard performance of procedures between the first time period (immediately after training) and each of the subsequent time periods for all but 1 procedure. The scoring of standardized performance when carried out with routine participant testing and training did not differ significantly from scoring from videotaped sessions submitted for standardization rating for 2 of the procedures, suggesting adequate validity of scoring from videotape.

Conclusions

The present method was successful in assessing protocol fidelity for the EXCITE research personnel and represents 1 means of addressing the longstanding problem in rehabilitation of the lack of standardization in administering different treatments and tests.
Keywords:Methods  Process assessment (Health Care)  Rehabilitation  Research design
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号