XRCC1 gene polymorphisms and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk in Chinese population: A meta‐analysis of case–control studies

Two non‐synonymous polymorphisms Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln in the DNA‐base excision repair gene X‐ray repair cross‐complementing group 1 (XRCC1) have been implicated in risk for esophageal cancer. However, the results from different studies remain controversial. The present meta‐analysis of literatures was performed to clarify these associations in Chinese population. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all case–control studies of XRCC1 polymorphisms Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln and risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A total of 9 eligible studies, including 1,538 ESCC cases and 2,472 controls, were identified to the meta‐analysis. The odds ratio (OR) for the variant homozygous genotype Trp/Trp of the Arg194Trp polymorphism, compared with the wild‐type homozygote Arg/Arg, was 1.59 (p = 0.0007), with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.22–2.09, for ESCC risk without between‐study heterogeneity. However, there was no statistically significant associations of ESCC risk in the dominant model Arg/Trp+Trp/Trp (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.84–1.12; p = 0.69) and heterozygous genotype Arg/Trp (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.77–1.04; p = 0.16) when comparing with wild‐type genotype Arg/Arg. For Arg399Gln, there was no effect in dominant modeling (Arg/Gln+Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Arg: OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.80–1.06; p = 0.25), and the variant Gln/Gln homozygote was not associated with ESCC risk (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.79–2.10; p = 0.31), either. In conclusion, Arg194Trp genetic polymorphism may be associated with an increased risk for developing ESCC and a study with the larger sample size is needed to further evaluate gene–environment interaction on XRCC1 polymorphisms and ESCC risk. © 2009 UICC