Vaccine-mediated protection of pigs against infection with pandemic H1N1 2009 swine influenza A virus requires a close antigenic match between the vaccine antigen and challenge virus |
| |
Authors: | Helen E. Everett Mario Aramouni Vivien Coward Andrew Ramsay Michael Kelly Sophie Morgan Elma Tchilian Laetitia Canini Mark E.J. Woolhouse Sarah Gilbert Bryan Charleston Ian H. Brown Sharon M. Brookes |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Virology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone KT15 3NB, UK;2. The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, ORCRB, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK;3. University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK;4. The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Swine influenza A virus (SwIV) infection has considerable economic and animal welfare consequences and, because of the zoonotic potential, can also have public health implications. The 2009 pandemic H1N1 ‘swine-origin’ infection is now endemic in both pigs and humans. In Europe, avian-like H1avN1, human-like H1huN2, human-like swine H3N2 and, since 2009, pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) lineage viruses and reassortants, constitute the dominant subtypes. In this study, we used a swine pH1N1 challenge virus to investigate the efficacy of whole inactivated virus vaccines homologous or heterologous to the challenge virus as well as a commercial vaccine. We found that vaccine-mediated protection was most effective when vaccine antigen and challenge virus were homologous and correlated with the specific production of neutralising antibodies and a cellular response to the challenge virus. We conclude that a conventional whole inactivated SwIV vaccine must be antigenically matched to the challenge strain to be an effective control measure. |
| |
Keywords: | Swine influenza A virus Pandemic 2009 influenza A virus H1N1 Whole inactivated virus vaccine Immune response |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|