Advances of 3T MR imaging in visualizing trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus are partially SNR‐independent: Analysis using simulated noise in relation to micro‐CT, 1.5T MRI,and biomechanical strength |
| |
| Authors: | Jan S. Bauer MD Roberto Monetti PhD Roland Krug PhD Maiko Matsuura MS Dirk Mueller MD Felix Eckstein MD Ernst J. Rummeny MD Eva‐Maria Lochmueller MD Christoph W. Raeth PhD Thomas M. Link MD |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Radiology, Technische Universit?t München, Munich, Germany;2. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, California;3. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, Germany;4. Institute of Anatomy, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universit?t München, Germany;5. Institute of Anatomy and Musculoskeletal Research, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria;6. Department of Gynecology I, LMU München, Germany |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose To investigate differences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of trabecular bone at 1.5T and 3.0T and to specifically study noise effects on the visualization and quantification of trabecular architecture using conventional histomorphometric and nonlinear measures of bone structure. Materials and Methods Sagittal MR images of 43 calcaneus specimens (donor age: 81 ± 10 years) were acquired at 1.5T and 3.0T using gradient echo sequences. Noise was added to obtain six sets of images with decreasing signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs). Micro‐CT images were obtained from biopsies taken from 37 calcaneus samples and bone strength was determined. Morphometric and nonlinear structure parameters were calculated in all datasets. Results Originally, SNR was 1.5 times higher at 3.0T. In the simulated image sets, SNR was similar at both fields. Trabecular dimensions measured by μCT were adequately estimated by MRI, with residual errors (er), ranging from 16% to 2.7% at 3.0T. Comparing er at similar SNR, 3.0T consistently displayed lower errors than 1.5T (eg, bone fraction at SNR ≈4: er[3.0T] = 15%; er[1.5T] = 21%, P < 0.05). Conclusion The advances of 3.0T compared to 1.5T in visualizing trabecular bone structure are partially SNR‐independent. The better performance at 3.0T may be explained by pronounced susceptibility, enhancing the visualization of thin trabecular structures. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:132–140. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
| |
| Keywords: | 3T MR imaging osteoporosis signal to noise ratio (SNR) susceptibility trabecular bone structure analysis |
|
|
