Randomised controlled trial of dexmedetomidine sedation vs general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia surgery on perioperative outcomes in infants

Background

Neonates and infants undergoing general anaesthesia for hernia surgery are at risk of perioperative cardiorespiratory adverse events. The use of regional anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine preserves airway tone and may potentially avoid these complications. This study compares the perioperative conditions and adverse events between dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block and general anaesthesia with caudal block for inguinal hernia surgery in infants.

Methods

A randomised controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Singapore involving 104 infants younger than 3 months, who were randomised to receive either dexmedetomidine sedation (DEX) with caudal block or general sevoflurane anaesthesia with tracheal intubation and caudal block (GA) for inguinal hernia surgery. Perioperative conditions, haemodynamics and adverse events were compared between groups.

Results

Fifty-one infants received DEX and 48 infants received GA. In the DEX group, 46 infants (90.2%) had their operations completed solely under this technique, two (3.9%) were converted to general anaesthesia with intubation, and three (5.9%) required brief administration of nitrous oxide or low-dose sevoflurane. Overall, 96.1% of infants in the DEX group did not require intubation. Perioperative conditions were similar in both groups. The DEX group had significantly lower heart rates and higher mean arterial pressures intraoperatively. Two infants in the DEX group (3.9%) required postoperative intensive care admission compared with six infants (12.5%) in the GA group.

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block provides a feasible alternative to general anaesthesia in infants undergoing hernia surgery. This technique avoids the need for tracheal intubation, which may be beneficial in neonates.

Clinical trial registration

NCT02559102.