Gender‐specific Regulatory Challenges to Product Approval: A Panel Discussion |
| |
Authors: | Alyson J. McGregor MD MA Helen Barr MD Marna R. Greenberg DO MPH Basmah Safdar MD MSc Peter Wildgoose PhD David W. Wright MD Judd E. Hollander MD |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, , Providence, RI;2. Office of Women's Heath, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, , Washington, DC;3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Lehigh Valley Hospital/USF Morsani College of Medicine, , Allentown, PA;4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, , New Haven, CT;5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, , New Brunswick, NJ;6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, , Atlanta, GA;7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical, , Philadelphia, PA |
| |
Abstract: | On May 13, 2014, a 1‐hour panel discussion session titled “Gender‐specific Regulatory Challenges to Product Approval” was held during the Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference, “Gender‐specific Research in Emergency Medicine: Investigate, Understand, and Translate How Gender Affects Patient Outcomes.” The session sought to bring together leaders in emergency medicine (EM) research, authors, and reviewers in EM research publications, as well as faculty, fellows, residents, and students engaged in research and clinical practice. A panel was convened involving a representative from the Office of Women's Health of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, two pharmaceutical executives, and a clinical EM researcher. The moderated discussion also involved audience members who contributed significantly to the dialogue. Historical background leading up to the session along with the main themes of the discussion are reproduced in this article. These revolve around sex‐ and gender‐specific research, statistical analysis of sex and gender, clinical practice, financial costs associated with pharmaceutical development, adaptive design, and specific recommendations on the regulatory process as it affects the specialty of EM. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|