首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Utilizing a PLASMIC score-based approach in the management of suspected immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a cost minimization analysis within the Harvard TMA Research Collaborative
Authors:Vivek A. Upadhyay  Benjamin P. Geisler  Lova Sun  Lynne Uhl  Richard M. Kaufman  Christopher Stowell  Robert S. Makar  Pavan K. Bendapudi
Affiliation:1. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA;3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA;4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Blood Transfusion Service, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA;5. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract:The PLASMIC score is a recently described clinical scoring algorithm that rapidly assesses the probability of severe ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) deficiency among patients presenting with microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia. Using a large multi-institutional cohort, we explored whether an approach utilizing the PLASMIC score to risk-stratify patients with suspected immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) could lead to significant cost savings. Our consortium consists of institutions with an unrestricted approach to ADAMTS13 testing (Group A) and those that require pre-approval by the transfusion medicine service (Group B). Institutions in Group A tested more patients than those in Group B (P < 0·001) but did not identify more cases of iTTP (P = 0·29) or have lower iTTP-related mortality (P = 0·84). Decision tree cost analysis showed that applying a PLASMIC score-based strategy to screen patients for ADAMTS13 testing in Group A would have reduced costs by approximately 27% over the 12-year period of our study compared to the current approach. Savings were primarily driven by a reduction in unnecessary therapeutic plasma exchanges, but lower utilization of ADAMTS13 testing and subspecialty consultations also contributed. Our data indicate that using the PLASMIC score to guide ADAMTS13 testing and the management of patients with suspected iTTP could be associated with significant cost savings.
Keywords:thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura  cost savings/effectiveness  TTP  ADAMTS13  PLASMIC
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号