首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

宫颈癌卵巢移位术后VMAT与IMRT卵巢放疗剂量的比较
引用本文:郭昌,吴一凡,翟振宇,徐寒子. 宫颈癌卵巢移位术后VMAT与IMRT卵巢放疗剂量的比较[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2021, 41(5): 334-339
作者姓名:郭昌  吴一凡  翟振宇  徐寒子
作者单位:江苏省肿瘤医院 江苏省肿瘤防治研究所 南京医科大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科 210009
基金项目:江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F201762)
摘    要:目的:比较行卵巢移位术后的宫颈癌患者固定野调强(IMRT)和容积旋转调强(VMAT)计划中卵巢的剂量学差异。方法:31例接受宫颈癌根治术和卵巢移位术,术后需放射治疗的患者,设计9野均分IMRT计划和双弧VMAT计划,在保证靶区处方剂量及危及器官限量的情况下,尽量降低卵巢剂量。分析两种技术卵巢平均剂量的差异,以及卵巢-靶...

关 键 词:宫颈癌  卵巢移位手术  调强放射治疗  卵巢  剂量
收稿时间:2020-09-07

Comparison of the ovarian sparing between VMAT and IMRT after ovarian transposition surgery for cervical cancer patients
Guo Chang,Wu Yifan,Zhai Zhenyu,Xu Hanzi. Comparison of the ovarian sparing between VMAT and IMRT after ovarian transposition surgery for cervical cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, 2021, 41(5): 334-339
Authors:Guo Chang  Wu Yifan  Zhai Zhenyu  Xu Hanzi
Affiliation:Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the dosimetric difference between IMRT and VMAT plans for ovarian protection after cervical cancer ovarian transposition surgery. Methods Thirty-one patients who had received both cervical cancer resection and ovarian transposition were selected for adjuvant radiotherapy. The 9-field evenly divided IMRT and the dual-arc VMAT technology were performed for the treatment planning. The difference of the ovarian mean dose between the two techniques was explored. The relationship between the position of the ovarian-target interval and the ovarian dose was also analyzed. Results A total of 54 ovaries in 31 patients were effectively transposed and moved out of the target area. Among them, 9 ovaries were located above the upper boundary of the PTV. For these cases, the ovarian mean dose of IMRT and VMAT were (177.8±90.7) and (166.7±70.6) cGy, respectively, which was not statistically different(P>0.05).45 ovaries were located in the same level with PTV. For these cases, the ovarian mean dose of IMRT and VMAT were (459.1±239.9) and (428.3±238.2) cGy, respectively (z=3.11,P=0.002). The ovarian mean dose has the highest correlation and negative correlation with the closest lateral distance from the ovarian volume center to the PTV surface (IMRT, r=-0.922,P=0.001;VMAT, r=-0.865,P=0.001). To reduce the ovarian mean dose to 500 cGy, the lateral closest distance between the ovarian volume center and the PTV surface should be 3.6 cm and 3.3 cm for IMRT and VMAT respectively. Conclusions There is no difference between the two planned ovarian doses when the ovaries were located above the upper boundary of the PTV. When the ovaries were located in the same level with PTV, the VMAT plan is better than IMRT in both ovarian dose and treatment efficiency. The ovarian dose could be predicted by the lateral closest distance from the ovarian volume center to the PTV.
Keywords:Cervical cancer  Ovarian transposition  Intensity modulated radiotherapy  Ovarian  Dose
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号