首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

远端进展期胃癌腹腔镜辅助与开腹根治术的远期疗效比较
引用本文:赵永亮,余佩武,钱锋,石彦,唐波,郝迎学,罗华星,兰远志.远端进展期胃癌腹腔镜辅助与开腹根治术的远期疗效比较[J].中华普通外科杂志,2011,26(9).
作者姓名:赵永亮  余佩武  钱锋  石彦  唐波  郝迎学  罗华星  兰远志
作者单位:第三军医大学西南医院全军普通外科中心微创胃肠外科中心,重庆,400038
摘    要:目的 探讨进展期胃癌腹腔镜根治术的安全性和可行性,并评价其远期临床疗效。方法 对2004年1月至2009年6月远端进展期胃癌行腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术346例患者的临床及随访资料和同期在我院行传统开腹胃癌手术的313例进行回顾性分析,比较两组的手术安全性、术后并发症、生存率以及癌症复发转移情况。结果 腹腔镜组手术平均用时与开腹组相比差异无统计学意义(211±56) min比(204±41)min,P>0.05]。腹腔镜组术中出血量、切口长度显著低于开腹手术组。腹腔镜组肿瘤近、远端切缘长度分别为(6.3±2.0) cm、(5.7±1.7)cm,开腹组分别为(6.3±2.1) cm、(5.6±1.6) cm,两组相比差异均无统计学意义。腹腔镜组淋巴结清扫数量为(33±13)枚,开腹组为(33±16)枚,两组相比差异无统计学意义。腹腔镜组术后并发症的发生率显著低于开腹组(6.7%比13.1%,P<0.01)。随访时间6~72个月,平均37个月,腹腔镜组1、3、5年生存率分别为87.2%、57.2%和50.3%,开腹组分别为87.1%、54.1%和49.2%,两组相比差异均无统计学意义。两组癌症复发转移率相比差异无统计学意义。结论 腹腔镜辅助的进展期胃癌根治术与开腹组在生存率及术后复发方面无显著差异,且具有创伤小、术后恢复快、并发症少等优点。

关 键 词:胃肿瘤  腹腔镜  胃切除术  淋巴结切除术

A comparative study on laparoscopic-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer
ZHAO Yong-liang,YU Pei-wu,QIAN Feng,SHI Yan,TANG Bo,HAO Ying-xue,LUO Hua-xing,LAN Yuan-zhi.A comparative study on laparoscopic-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer[J].Chinese Journal of General Surgery,2011,26(9).
Authors:ZHAO Yong-liang  YU Pei-wu  QIAN Feng  SHI Yan  TANG Bo  HAO Ying-xue  LUO Hua-xing  LAN Yuan-zhi
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety and the long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and follow-up data of 346 cases after LADG from January 2004 to June 2009, compared with 313 cases after conventional open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for advanced gastric cancer at the same period at our hospital. The surgical safety, postoperative complications, survival rate, and the recurrence and metastasis of cancer were compared. Results There was no significant difference at the average time of LADG and ODG procedures (211 ± 56) min vs. (204 ±41 ) min, but blood loss during operation and length of incision in LADG group were significantly less than in the ODG group. The proximal and distal length were, respectively, (6. 3 ± 2. 0) cm and (5. 7 ± 1.7 ) cm in LADG group and (6. 3 ±2. 1 ) cm and (5.6 ± 1.6) cm in ODG group, the difference was not significant. The number of lymph node dissections was also similar: (33 ± 13) in LADG group and (33 ± 16) in ODG group. The incidence of postoperative complications in LADG group was significantly lower than that in ODG group ( 6. 7% vs.13. 1%, P < 0. 05). During the follow-up period of 6-72 months (average 37 months), the 1-, 3-and 5-year survival rates were, respectively, 87. 2%, 57. 2% and 50. 3% in LADG group and 87. 1%, 54. 1%and 49. 2% in ODG group, the difference was not significant. The differences in recurrence and metastasis between the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclsion Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer is not significantly different with open surgery in postoperative survival rate or recurrence. It is less traumatic and of fewer complications.
Keywords:Stomach neoplasms  Laparoscope  Gastrectomy  Lymph node excision
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号