Apheresis Technologies: An International Perspective |
| |
Authors: | Paul S. Malchesky,Rolf Bambauer,Takashi Horiuchi&dagger ,DAndre Kaplan&Dagger ,Yutaka Sakurada§ ,Gustav Samuelsson& |
| |
Affiliation: | STERIS Corporation, Mentor, Ohio, U.S.A.;University of Saarland, Arzt Fur Innere Medizin, HomburglSaar, Germany;Graduate School of the University of East Asia, Yamaguchi, Japan;University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.;Haemonetics Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan;Excorim AB, Lund, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract: The developments in apheresis techniques and their clinical applications world-wide are technologically driven. In the past, apheresis survey statistics have highlighted both the differences by region in clinical practice and in the types of technologies utilized. Such differences have provided a basis for the scientific and clinical assessments of these apheresis technologies and their clinical outcomes and have stimulated the marketing and business development of new technologies world-wide. A review of the regional practices and technologies utilized provides a perspective on the future role of apheresis and its developments in clinical practice. While technology is a driving force for the development of new techniques for clinical practice, it is not the only market force. For technology introduction, several other important issues need to be considered. Regulations at the local and, most importantly, the federal level impact the timing for new technology introduction. Reimbursement by healthcare payers is critically important from the initiation of the development of a technology through its clinical use. Clinical trials are critically important to show the safety and clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the technology in order for payers to provide reimbursement for its use, but these trials are sometimes long and costly. Research funding availability at the governmental and commercial levels critically impacts new technology investigation and its introduction. Apheresis technology developments offer new hopes and promises for the clinical team; however, their development, introduction, and utilization will be influenced by the prevailing market forces. |
| |
Keywords: | Apheresis technologies |
|
|