首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of two laser Doppler flowmetry systems for bone blood flow analysis
Authors:Dr. Marc F. Swiontkowski  Frank Schlehr  Jerry C. Collins  Roy Sanders  Adrienne Pou
Affiliation:(1) The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University, 37232 Nashville, Tennessee, USA;(2) The Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, 37232 Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Abstract:Summary The development of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has provided a real-time, reliable method for monitoring capillary perfusion in multiple tissues. LDF has potential for the experimental and clinical assessment of bone blood flow. To compare the accuracy and ease of use of two commercially available laser Doppler flowmeters with different mechanisms for processing the Doppler-shifted component of light, estimates of bone blood flow were obtained in a sheep model using the two systems, and the values derived then compared with estimates of bone blood flow also obtained in a sheep using the technique of injection of labeled microspheres. The single-channel laser Doppler flowmeter, the LD 5000, processes the reference and Doppler-shifted beams on the surface of a single photodetector using optical heterodyning for measurement. The dual-channel flowmeter, the Periflux 2, uses two optical fibers to transmit reference and Doppler-shifted light to two separate photodetectors. The differential amplification and detection system improves the signal-to-noise ratio. Measurement of both metaphyseal (cancellous) and diaphyseal (cortical) blood flow using both LDF systems was compared with values obtained with an injection of85Sr-labeled microspheres in three sheep. The LDF measurements were repeated after occlusion of the left femoral artery, and a46Sc microsphere injection was performed prior to animal sacrifice. Two of the animals developed vasomotor instability, resulting in poor correlation between the measurements obtained with the Periflux 2, which is motion sensitive, and the values obtained with the microsphere method. High correlation was apparent in two of the three animals for the LD 5000 and the microsphere values. Four additional sheep were evaluated using only the Periflux 2, and the data collected yielded R values of 0.6–0.98. Both the single- and dual-channel LDF systems offer accurate assessment of local cortical and cancellous bone blood flow.
Keywords:Bone blood flow  Laser Doppler flowmetry  Microspheres
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号