大学生村官心理卫生现状分析

目的 了解大学生村官心理卫生状况，为提高大学生村官心理卫生水平提供参考依据。方法 采用成人心理弹性量表（RSA）、主观幸福感量表（SWLS）和症状自评量表（SCL-90）简版及自编一般情况问卷对江苏、山东、四川、陕西、北京等省市220名大学生村官进行问卷调查。结果 大学生村官心理弹性总分及自我效能、组织风格、社交能力、家庭凝聚力、社会资源维度得分分别为（4.07±0.38）、（4.11±0.77）、（4.08±0.54）、（3.77±0.68）、（4.45±0.67）、（3.39±0.74）分，均低于全国成人样本的（5.13±0.41）、（4.92±0.58）、（4.76±0.51）、（5.12±0.61）、（5.26±0.62）、（5.63±0.57）分（均P<0.01）；生活满意度、积极情感分别为（3.70±1.38）和（3.37±0.53）分，均低于成人样本的（4.07±0.92）和（3.79±0.49）分（均P<0.01），消极情感为（2.62±0.53）分，高于成人样本的（2.16±0.66）分（t=10.97，P<0.01）；大学生村官心理症状总分及失能混乱、躯体反应、人际问题得分分别为（1.97±0.71）、（2.07±0.77）、（1.86±0.81）、（1.84±0.71）分，均高于成人样本的（1.44±0.42）、（1.53±0.45）、（1.42±0.44）、（1.51±0.49）分（均P<0.01）；不同性别、是否独生子女、是否学生干部经历的大学生村官的心理卫生水平差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 大学生村官心理卫生状况较差。

Mental health status among college student village leaders

Objective To explore mental health condition in college student village leaders,and to provide evidence for improving mental health level of the leaders.Methods A survey was conducted in 220 college student village leaders with Resilience Scale for Adults,Subjective Well-Being Scale,and Symptom Checklist-90 Brief Edition(SCL-90).Results Compared with those of national adult group,the college student village leaders had siginificantly lower scores for overall resilience(4.07±0.38 vs 5.13±0.41),organizational style(4.11±0.77 vs 4.92±0.58),sociability(3.77±0.68 vs 4.08±0.54),family cohesion(4.55±0.67 vs 5.26±0.62),social resource(3.39±0.74 vs 5.63±0.57),life satisfaction(3.70±1.38 vs 4.07±0.92),and positive emotionality(3.37±0.53 vs 3.79±0.49)(P<0.01 for all),but a higher score for negative emotionality(2.62±0.53 vs 2.16±0.66)(P<0.01).Compared with those of national adult group, the college student village leaders had significantly higher SCL-90 scores for psychological symptoms(1.97±0.71 vs 1.44±0.42),disability confusion(2.07±0.77 vs 1.53±0.45),somatization(1.86±0.81 vs 1.42±0.44),and interpersonal problems(1.84±0.71 vs 1.51±0.49)(P<0.05 for all).There were significant differences in mental health status among the college student village leaders of different gender,whether being a only-child,and whether having student cader experience(P<0.05 or P<0.01).Conclusion The mental health status of college student village leaders is poor.