两种方案治疗急性冠周炎的成本-效果分析 |
| |
引用本文: | 王凯,牛福喜,郭平华. 两种方案治疗急性冠周炎的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国药业, 2008, 17(15): 58-59 |
| |
作者姓名: | 王凯 牛福喜 郭平华 |
| |
作者单位: | 1. 安阳市人民医院,河南,安阳,455000 2. 安阳市眼科医院,河南,安阳,455000 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的探讨甲硝唑和奥硝唑两种方案治疗急性冠周炎的成本-效果。方法将96例急性冠周炎患者随机均分为两组,甲组予奥硝唑片0.5g,2次/d,口服,乙组予甲硝唑片0.2g,3次/d,口服,两组均用3%双氧水和生理盐水交替冲洗盲袋,1次/d,进行7d的疗效观察和不良反应观察,并采用成本-效果分析方法进行评价。结果甲组和乙组总成本分剐为93.80元和35.61元,总有效率分别为91.67%和60.42%,不良反应发生率分别为12.5%和27.1%。结论甲组成本高,疗效好,乙组成本虽低,但疗效也差;不良反应发生率乙组明显高于甲组。成本-效果分析表明。奥硝唑治疗急性冠周炎明显优于甲硝唑。
|
关 键 词: | 成本-效果分析 药物经济学 急性冠周炎 |
Cost-effect Analysis on Two Treatment Schemes of Acute Pericoronitis |
| |
Affiliation: | Wang Kai, Niu Fuxi, Guo Pinghua (1. Anyang Municipal People's Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China 455000; 2. Anyang Municipal Eye Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China 455000) |
| |
Abstract: | Objective To discuss the cost- effect of two schemes in treating acute pericoronitis. Methods 96 patients with acute pericoronitis were divided into two groups. Group A was given oral Ornidazole Tablets 0.5 g, b. i. d, and group B was given oral metronidazole tablets 0.2 g, t. i. d. The blind sack in group A and group B was cleaned with 3% H2O2 and physiological saline in turn, once daily. The curative effect and adverse reactions were investigated and evaluated by the cost- effect method after 7 d of treatment. Results The total costs of group A and group B were RMB 93.80 and 35.61 respectively. The general effective rates were 91.67% and 60.42% respectively, Conclusion The cost in group A is higher than group B, but the curative effects is better than it. Group B has more adverse reactions compared with group A. Ornidazole is superior to metronidazole in treating acute pericoronitis. |
| |
Keywords: | cost - effect analysis pharmacoeconomics acute pericoronitis |
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|