首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

电刺激器放置时间对周围神经再生影响的实验研究
引用本文:于占革 贾继峰. 电刺激器放置时间对周围神经再生影响的实验研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 1999, 6(7): 517-519
作者姓名:于占革 贾继峰
作者单位:哈尔滨医科大学第一临床医学院骨科,巴彦县人民医院骨科,庆安县人民医院骨科
摘    要:目的:探索周围神经再生开始后,挪开电刺激器是否对神经再生有影响。方法:把Wistar鼠制成坐骨神经离断模型。A、B组为电刺激器放置组;C组将医用硅胶管套在神经缝合处。A、C组持续观察4周;B组2周时取出电刺激器,继续观察2周。结果:A、B组在形态学、电生理学指标上均优于C组,A、B组间差异无显著意义。结论:电刺激器对周围神经再生有促进作用,一旦神经再生开始去除电场对神经再生不产生影响。

关 键 词:电刺激器  周围神经  再生

Experimental Study on the Effect of Implanting Time of Current Stimulator to Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
Yu Zhange,Jia Jifeng,Yu Weiliang,et al.. Experimental Study on the Effect of Implanting Time of Current Stimulator to Peripheral Nerve Regeneration[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China, 1999, 6(7): 517-519
Authors:Yu Zhange  Jia Jifeng  Yu Weiliang  et al.
Affiliation:Yu Zhange,Jia Jifeng,Yu Weiliang,et al.The First Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150001.
Abstract:Objective:To study when peripheral nerve regeneration has begun whether there was any influence on the nerve regeneration after removing of the current stimulator.Methods:Wistar rats weight 200250g were selected,sciatic nerve transected models were made,which were divided into A,B,C three groups.Group A and group B current stimulators were implanted,group C silicone tubes were placed in the anastomotic site.Group A and group C were observed for 4 weeks.Group B current stimulators were removed at 2 weeks postoperatively and observed another 2 weeks.Results:The electrophysiological and morphometric index in the experimental group were much better than those in the control group,and there was no significant difference between group A and group B.Conclusion:current stimulator could facilitate peripheral nerve regeneration,once the regeneration has commenced,the removal of the electric field had no effect on regeneration.
Keywords:Current stimulatorPeripheral nerveRegeneration  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号