Tropisetron (Navoban) in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting — the Nordic experience |
| |
Authors: | Bengt Sorbe Håkan Andersson Margareta Schmidt Martin Söderberg Thomas Högberg Lars Wernstedt Eva Tiensuu Janson Bengt Ehrnström Mogens Kjaer Hanne Havsteen Maria Overgaard Erik Sandberg Martti Flander Mirja Heikkinen Väinämö Nikkanen |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Gynecological oncology, Örebro Medical Center Hospital, S-70185 Örebro, Sweden;(2) Department of Gynecological Oncology, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden;(3) Department of Gynecological Oncology, Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden;(4) Department of Oncology, Karlstad Central Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden;(5) Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden;(6) Department of Lung Diseases, Renströmska Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden;(7) Department of Medicine, Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden;(8) Department of Oncology, Örebro Medical Center Hospital, Örebro, Sweden;(9) Department of Oncology, Aalborg Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark;(10) Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark;(11) Department of Oncology, Aarhus Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark;(12) Department of Oncology, Esbjerg Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark;(13) Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Tampere, Finland;(14) Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Oulu, Finland;(15) Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland |
| |
Abstract: | An open,noncomparative, Nordic multicenter study was carried out during 1991–1992 to evaluate the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron (Navoban) as an antiemetic agent for various types of cancer chemotherapy. A total of 630 patients were recruited from 15 centers in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Gynecological cancers (60%), breast cancer (15%), and lung cancer (10%) were the main diagnoses. Prior experience of chemotherapy was documented in 338 patients (54%). In 260 patients (41%), cisplatin was part of the cytostatic regimen. Carboplatin (23%), doxorubicin (27%), and epidoxorubicin (24%) were also frequently included. In all, 23 cytostatic agents were used in various combinations. The mean number of courses studied was 4.6 (range 1–19). Altogether, 394 of 619 evaluable patients (64%) were completely protected from acute nausea and vomiting during the first course of chemotherapy. Delayed nausea and vomiting were completely prevented in 45%–73% (days 2–6) in the complete series. Treatment efficacy remained stable (60%–79%) during ten consecutive courses of chemotherapy. With noncisplatin regimens, complete protection from acute nausea and vomiting was achieved in 72% compared with 52% for cisplatin regimens (P<0.0001). Patients without prior experience of chemotherapy had higher control rates of acute nausea and vomiting (72%) compared to patients treated before (57%) during the first course,but not later on. There were no differences in delayed nausea and vomiting. Sex and age were significant prognostic factors with regard to antiemetic response. Adverse events were recorded in 19%–37% of the cases during long-term follow-up. Headache (18%) and constipation (8%) were most frequent. The side effects were mild, however, and tropisetron (Navoban) was a safe drug and was well tolerated by the patients. |
| |
Keywords: | Navoban Tropisetron 5-HT3 receptor antagonists Antiemetics Chemotherapy |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|