Clinical study on the effects of a cosmetic product on dermal extracellular matrix components using a high‐resolution multiphoton tomograph |
| |
Authors: | R. Bazin F. Flament A. Colonna R. Le Harzic R. Bückle B. Piot F. Laizé M. Kaatz K. König J. W. Fluhr |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. L'Oréal, Recherche, Chevilly‐Larue, France;2. L'Oréal, Recherche, Aulnay‐sous‐Bois, France;3. Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Technology (IBMT), St Ingbert, Germany;4. Laboratory of Skin Physiology, Department of Dermatology, University of Jena, Germany;5. Bioskin, Berlin, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Background/purpose: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effects of selected plant extracts in a cosmetic cream on the dermal network components after a 3‐month treatment using an in vivo multiphoton tomographic device. Methods: Twenty‐four Caucasian women aged between 45 and 65 applied randomly a cosmetic emulsion B containing active ingredients (soy and jasmine) twice a day on one arm and its vehicle A (without active ingredients) on the other arm during 3 months. Measurements were performed on the internal side of the forearm before starting the treatment (T0), after 4 week (T4) and 12 weeks (T12) treatment. Measurements consisted in a multi‐layers acquisitions using a multiphoton tomograph with subcellular resolution. Optical sections (about 6 μm thick) were recorded from 0 to about 200 μm using two different wavelengths: 760 and 820 nm. To compare the series of images and obtain an objective quantification of the signal of second harmonic generation (SHG) and autofluorescence, the method used consisted in taking the integrated brightness of an image (same rectangular area for all images) as a measure of the signal. Following this step a ratio between brightness of images from the area treated with cream A or B and brightness of untreated area was calculated and used as an assessment of treatment efficacy. The parameter used for statistical analysis (variance analysis) is the difference before and after 12 weeks of treatment by either cream A or B of the signal ratios calculated in the upper dermis (118–130 μm) and those from a deeper region of the upper dermis (165–178 μm). Results: Signals (autofluorescence+SHG) of extracellular matrix do not change significantly with time (weeks 0, 4 and 12) when cream A (vehicle with no active ingredient) is applied. Treatment with cream B results in an enhancement in the signal level of extracellular matrix at week 12. The comparison of signals, in both areas (118–130 μm and 160–178 μm), show an higher increase in the deeper region than in the more superficial one for product B while we do not notice any change with product A. Conclusion: The multiphoton tomograph provided excellent high‐resolution images, which describe clearly the different skin layers, single cells and extracellular matrix components in all the 24 volunteers. Statistic analyses reveal a real effect for product B with selected plant extracts, known to increase collagen synthesis. Changes observed are characteristics of modifications in dermal collagen and elastin content. To our knowledge, it is the first time that it was possible to demonstrate in vivo the effect of a cosmetic product on the superficial dermal layer, in a non‐invasive and non‐destructive process, i.e. without cutting the skin. |
| |
Keywords: | Multiphoton Spectroscopy Multiphoton tomography extracellular matrix second harmonic generation dermal structures |
|
|