Sleep Disordered Breathing and Arrhythmia Burden in Pacemaker Recipients |
| |
Authors: | MARGHERITA PADELETTI M.D. SIMONE VIGNINI M.D. GIUSEPPE RICCIARDI M.D. PAOLO PIERAGNOLI M.D. VALERIO ZACÀ M.D. MICHELE EMDIN M.D. STEFANO FUMAGALLI M.D. SANJA JELIC M.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;2. Postgraduate School of Cardiology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy;3. Cardiovascular Medicine Department, G. Monasterio Foundation, CNR, Pisa, Italy;4. Department of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Florence, Florence, Italy;5. Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, New York, New York |
| |
Abstract: | Background: Sleep disordered breathing (SDB), a common condition among patients with permanent pacemaker (PM), is associated with greater incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. Scarce availability of sleep laboratories and the high costs of nocturnal‐attended polysomnography limit the routine screening of patients with PM for SDB. We investigated whether a novel PM that utilizes variations in transthoracic impedance to record the fluctuations in breathing pattern and minute ventilation could be used to screen patients for SDB. Methods: Twenty patients who underwent dual‐chamber PM implantation were studied. The Talent 3 DR PM (SORIN Group Italy S.r.l., Milan, Italy) calculates apnea‐hypopnea index (AHI) by computing minute ventilation signal derived from transthoracic impedance measurements. Within a month after PM implantation, an in‐home respiratory monitoring was performed to evaluate the accuracy of PM‐derived AHI. Patients were followed for mean ± standard deviation, 487 ± 166 days. The PM was checked at each follow‐up visit to retrieve the information about recurrent arrhythmias. Results: Eleven patients were diagnosed with SDB by an in‐home respiratory monitoring. An AHI derived from an in‐home respiratory monitoring was similar to pacemaker‐derived AHI (27 ± 14 vs 16 ± 13 events/hour, P = 0.15). The cumulative incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, extrasystolic beats, sustained and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and supraventricular tachycardia was similar in patients with and without SDB. Conclusion: SDB is highly prevalent in patients with permanent pacemaker. Screening for SDB with Talent 3 DR PM may facilitate diagnosis and treatment of SDB. (PACE 2010; 33:1462–1466) |
| |
Keywords: | electrophysiolog— clinical pacing new technology |
|
|